Share This Link

Illness anxiety disorder involves excessive worry about having a serious illness, often despite minimal or no symptoms. While this choice relates to anxiety about being sick, it does not encompass the chronic physical symptoms without clear medical explanation that the client in the scenario is experiencing.

Conversion disorder involves neurological symptoms such as altered motor functions or sensory deficits that cannot be explained by medical conditions. However, this choice doesn't account for the chronic nature of the symptoms described in the scenario.

Factitious disorder involves intentionally falsifying or inducing physical or psychological symptoms for the purpose of assuming the sick role. This choice does not reflect the chronic nature of the symptoms in the scenario, nor does it address the distress experienced by the client.

Altered motor functions and sensory symptoms are more indicative of conversion disorder rather than illness anxiety disorder. Conversion disorder involves neurological symptoms that cannot be medically explained, which contrasts with the preoccupation with serious illness seen in illness anxiety disorder.

Intentionally producing physical symptoms for attention aligns with factitious disorder, where individuals feign or induce symptoms to assume the sick role. This behavior does not align with the diagnostic criteria for illness anxiety disorder.

Experiencing chronic physical symptoms with excessive responses might be seen in somatic symptom disorder, where the distress and impairment caused by the symptoms are disproportionate. However, this choice does not specifically address the preoccupation with serious illness that defines illness anxiety disorder.

Knowing that one is pretending to have symptoms aligns with factitious disorder, where individuals intentionally feign or induce symptoms. This choice does not fit the description of the client in the scenario.

This statement is more consistent with illness anxiety disorder, where the individual is excessively worried about having a serious illness despite minimal symptoms. It doesn't reflect the symptoms of altered voluntary motor function mentioned in the scenario.

Intentionally inducing symptoms for attention is a characteristic of factitious disorder, not conversion disorder. This choice does not align with the involuntary nature of the symptoms described in the scenario.

"I'm struggling with altered motor function.". Choice A is not associated with the behavior described in the question. Altered motor function typically refers to difficulties with movement and coordination, which may be genuine physical issues but are not indicative of intentionally falsifying symptoms for attention.

"I don't know why I'm feeling this way.". Choice B does not accurately reflect the behavior of repeatedly falsifying psychological symptoms for attention. This statement suggests a lack of understanding regarding one's feelings, rather than intentionally seeking attention through fabricated symptoms.

"I'm worried about having a serious illness.". Choice D does not align with the behavior of intentionally falsifying psychological symptoms for attention. Expressing concern about a serious illness might indicate genuine health-related anxiety but does not reflect the behavior described in the question.

"Factitious disorder.". Choice A is not the correct answer for this question. Factitious disorder involves intentionally producing or feigning physical or psychological symptoms in oneself to assume the sick role, but it's not primarily characterized by excessive responses to the symptoms. It is more about assuming the role of a patient for psychological reasons.

"Conversion disorder.". Choice C is not the correct answer. Conversion disorder involves experiencing neurological-like symptoms, such as paralysis or blindness, that cannot be attributed to a medical condition. The symptoms often arise due to psychological stressors and are not intentionally produced or exaggerated for attention.

"Illness anxiety disorder.". Choice D is not the correct answer. Illness anxiety disorder, formerly known as hypochondriasis, involves excessive worry about having a serious illness despite minimal or no medical evidence of such an illness. The focus is on the fear of having a disease, rather than the distressing physical symptoms described in the question.

"Conversion disorder.". Choice A is not the correct answer. Conversion disorder involves the development of physical symptoms, such as motor or sensory deficits, that suggest a neurological or medical condition but are actually caused by psychological factors. It does not involve intentional production or falsification of symptoms for attention.

"Illness anxiety disorder.". Choice B is not the correct answer. Illness anxiety disorder is characterized by excessive worry and fear of having a serious illness, even in the absence of medical evidence. It does not involve intentional fabrication of symptoms for attention.

"Somatic symptom disorder.". Choice D is not the correct answer. Somatic symptom disorder involves experiencing distressing physical symptoms that interfere with daily life. While the symptoms are real and genuinely felt, the central issue in somatic symptom disorder is the excessive response to these symptoms and the preoccupation with health concerns. It is not primarily about intentionally falsifying symptoms for attention.

Avoidance of distressing situations. This choice suggests that the primary motivation for the client's behavior is to avoid situations that cause distress. While this may be a factor in some cases of illness-related behaviors, it is not the primary motivation described in the scenario. The client's persistent fear and belief of having a serious illness despite minimal or no symptoms indicate a different underlying motivation.

Seeking emotional relief. While seeking emotional relief may be a secondary motivation for some individuals with somatic symptom disorders, it is not the primary motivation described in the scenario. The client's behavior is primarily driven by the intentional production of symptoms and the associated beliefs, rather than a sole focus on emotional relief.

Gaining attention and sympathy. While seeking attention and sympathy may be an outcome of the client's behavior, it is not the primary motivation. The client's behavior is rooted in their belief of having a serious illness, leading to intentional symptom production, rather than solely seeking attention or sympathy.

Medication-based therapy - While medications can be a part of the treatment plan for somatic symptom illnesses to manage specific symptoms like anxiety or depression, they primarily address physiological symptoms and may not directly target underlying emotional factors. They are often used in conjunction with psychotherapy.

Surgical intervention - Surgical procedures are typically not the primary approach for managing somatic symptom illnesses. These illnesses are characterized by physical symptoms that are influenced by emotional factors, and surgical intervention does not address the underlying emotional aspects.

Physical therapy - Physical therapy primarily deals with musculoskeletal and movement-related issues. While it can be beneficial for individuals with certain physical symptoms, it doesn't primarily target the emotional factors that underlie somatic symptom illnesses.

Substance use or withdrawal and medication side effects - While substance use, withdrawal, and medication side effects can impact an individual's overall well-being and potentially exacerbate physical symptoms, they are not core factors that contribute to the development and maintenance of somatic symptom illnesses.

Childhood abuse or neglect and family history of mental disorders - These factors can contribute to the development of various mental health conditions, but they are not specific to somatic symptom illnesses. Somatic symptom illnesses involve the interaction between emotional factors and physical symptoms that are not fully explained by medical conditions.

Social isolation and cultural expectations regarding health - While social isolation and cultural expectations can influence an individual's perception of health and illness, they are more likely to play a secondary role in the context of somatic symptom illnesses. These illnesses are primarily rooted in the interaction between psychological and physiological factors.

Symptoms that are fully explained by a medical condition - Somatic symptom illnesses are characterized by physical symptoms that are not fully explained by medical conditions. If symptoms are entirely accounted for by a medical diagnosis, the individual may not meet the criteria for a somatic symptom illness.

Symptoms that remain constant in intensity and location - Somatic symptom illnesses often involve symptoms that are variable in intensity and may migrate to different body systems over time. This variability is influenced by emotional factors and distinguishes these illnesses from conditions with consistent, anatomically based symptoms.

Symptoms that are proportional to the underlying cause - Somatic symptom illnesses can lead to symptoms that are disproportionate to the underlying medical cause. This disproportionate relationship between symptoms and physiological findings is a key characteristic of these illnesses.

Symptoms that do not affect psychological well-being - Somatic symptom illnesses inherently involve a significant impact on psychological well-being. The distress and impairment caused by the physical symptoms are a core aspect of these illnesses, differentiating them from purely physical conditions.​​​​​​​

Encouraging the client to ignore their physical symptoms would not be an appropriate intervention. Somatic symptom illness involves genuine distress and discomfort, and disregarding the symptoms might lead to increased frustration and anxiety.

Explaining that the symptoms are purely psychological oversimplifies the situation. While psychological factors do play a role in somatic symptom illness, the symptoms are not purely imaginary. Validating the client's experiences while addressing underlying emotional factors is a more comprehensive approach.

Providing excessive attention and sympathy to the client might inadvertently reinforce their focus on physical symptoms rather than addressing the underlying emotional issues. This approach could potentially contribute to the maintenance of somatic symptom illness.

Encouraging the client to focus solely on physical symptoms neglects the emotional aspect of somatic symptom illness. A comprehensive approach involves addressing both the physical symptoms and the underlying emotions.

Advising the client to ignore their emotional experiences dismisses an essential component of their condition. Ignoring emotions can lead to emotional distress and exacerbate the somatic symptoms.

Suggesting that the client suppress their emotions would not be beneficial. Emotional suppression can contribute to increased psychological distress and hinder the client's progress toward better emotional well-being.

The client's ability to perfectly articulate their emotions, while important, is not the primary focus of the assessment for somatic symptom illness. The emphasis is on identifying potential physical causes and addressing underlying emotional factors.

Reviewing the client's social media posts for symptom updates might not yield reliable or comprehensive information regarding their condition. It's more appropriate to gather information through direct communication and medical assessment.

Exploring the client's childhood hobbies and interests may not directly contribute to the assessment of somatic symptom illness. While understanding the client's background is important, focusing on medical and psychological aspects is more relevant in this context.

Avoiding any discussion of the client's physical symptoms would be counterproductive in building a therapeutic nurse-client relationship. Ignoring the client's concerns might lead to feelings of neglect and hinder the development of trust and rapport.

Dismissing the client's emotional experiences would be detrimental to their well-being. Clients with somatic symptom illness often have genuine distress related to their physical symptoms. Addressing their emotional experiences validates their feelings and aids in uncovering the underlying psychological factors contributing to their symptoms.

Using sarcasm to help the client confront their behavior is inappropriate and unprofessional. Sarcasm can damage the therapeutic relationship, making the client feel ridiculed and unheard. Respectful and empathetic communication is crucial in nursing care, especially when dealing with individuals who are experiencing distress.

Discouraging the client from seeking professional help would be detrimental to their well-being. Somatic symptom illness often requires a multidisciplinary approach, involving both medical and psychological interventions. Encouraging professional help-seeking is essential for effective management.

Promoting passive-aggressive behavior as a coping strategy is not appropriate. Passive-aggressive behavior can hinder effective communication and exacerbate the client's distress. Encouraging healthy coping mechanisms and addressing the underlying psychological factors is a more beneficial approach.

Advising the client to continue avoiding physical activities is not recommended. Encouraging physical activity within the client's capabilities can have positive effects on their overall well-being. Avoidance of physical activities might lead to deconditioning and worsen the client's physical and emotional state.

Providing excessive attention to the client's physical complaints is not conducive to the client's progress. While it's important to address the client's concerns, excessive focus on physical complaints can reinforce illness behavior and hinder the development of healthier coping mechanisms.

Withholding praise for the client's achievements is not supportive of the client's progress. Positive reinforcement is essential for motivating and reinforcing adaptive behaviors. By acknowledging the client's achievements, the nurse can boost their self-esteem and encourage continued improvement.

Encouraging the client to focus solely on their illness behavior is counterproductive. Overemphasis on illness behavior can perpetuate the symptoms and prevent the client from developing a broader sense of identity and well-being.

Amitriptyline is a tricyclic antidepressant used to treat depression and certain types of pain. While it may help manage pain associated with somatic symptom illness, it is not classified primarily as an analgesic.

Sertraline is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) commonly used to treat depression and anxiety disorders. It is not classified as an analgesic and is not primarily intended for pain relief.

Lorazepam is a benzodiazepine used to treat anxiety disorders and is not classified as an analgesic. Its main effects are on anxiety reduction and sedation.

While symptoms can vary, stating that symptoms will worsen over time, leading to severe impairment in functioning (Choice B) is not accurate for the majority of cases of somatic symptom illnesses. Most individuals can experience improvement with proper management and treatment.

Complete disappearance of symptoms after a single round of medication (Choice C) is unlikely for most somatic symptom illnesses. These conditions often have complex underlying factors that require a multidimensional approach for effective management.

While mood improvement is possible with treatment, stating that the physical symptoms will remain unchanged (Choice D) is overly pessimistic. Treatment approaches aim to address both physical and psychological aspects of somatic symptom illnesses.

Hypnosis (Choice A) is a relaxation technique that involves inducing a trance-like state of heightened focus and suggestibility. It does not involve electronic devices for monitoring physiological functions.

Acupuncture (Choice B) is a traditional Chinese medicine practice involving needle insertion at specific points on the body. It is not related to using electronic devices for physiological monitoring.

Psychotherapy (Choice C) encompasses various talk therapies used to address mental health issues. It does not specifically involve electronic devices for physiological feedback.

Somatic symptom illnesses are not solely caused by biological factors. While there can be some biological factors that contribute to these illnesses, they are not the sole determinant. Somatic symptom illnesses involve a combination of biological, psychological, and social factors that interact to create the overall clinical picture. This choice is incorrect as it oversimplifies the nature of somatic symptom illnesses.

This choice is incorrect. Somatic symptom illnesses are not indicative of laziness or malingering on the part of the client. These illnesses are genuine and can cause significant distress to the individuals experiencing them. Labeling them as laziness or malingering is not only inaccurate but also stigmatizing. Somatic symptom illnesses are complex and require a comprehensive understanding for proper management.

Somatic symptom illnesses are not exclusively caused by psychological factors. While psychological factors can contribute to the onset and exacerbation of these illnesses, there is often a biological basis as well. The interplay between psychological, biological, and social factors is essential to understanding these disorders. This choice is incorrect because it disregards the biological component that plays a role in somatic symptom illnesses.

The client's dietary preferences, while important for overall health, are not directly related to the management of somatic symptom illnesses. These illnesses are characterized by excessive focus on physical symptoms that may not have an organic cause. Dietary preferences are more relevant to nutritional status and general well-being.

The client's financial status can impact their access to healthcare resources and treatment options, but it is not a factor that directly influences the outcomes of managing somatic symptom illnesses. These illnesses are primarily psychological in nature and involve the interpretation and management of physical sensations.

The client's preference for alternative medicine may influence their treatment approach, but it is not a key factor that universally affects outcomes in managing somatic symptom illnesses. These illnesses are typically addressed through a combination of psychological interventions and, in some cases, medical management.

Hypnosis involves inducing a trance-like state to enhance focus and concentration, but it does not involve inserting needles into the body. It is often used for relaxation, pain management, and behavioral changes.

Biofeedback involves teaching individuals to control physiological processes such as heart rate, muscle tension, and blood pressure. It provides real-time information about these processes, allowing individuals to learn how to regulate them. However, it does not involve the insertion of needles into the body.

Physical therapy focuses on improving physical function and mobility through exercises and techniques. It does not involve the use of needles or energy flow stimulation, making it less relevant to somatic symptom illness treatment compared to acupuncture.

Psychodynamic therapy - Psychodynamic therapy focuses on exploring unconscious conflicts and childhood experiences to understand and address current psychological issues. While it can be beneficial for various mental health concerns, it may not be the primary approach for challenging and changing negative thoughts and beliefs that contribute to somatic symptom illnesses.

Family therapy - Family therapy involves addressing family dynamics and interactions to improve overall family functioning. While family support is important, family therapy might not be the primary approach to directly address the negative thoughts and beliefs contributing to somatic symptoms.

Interpersonal therapy - Interpersonal therapy focuses on improving interpersonal relationships and communication. While these skills are valuable, this type of therapy might not be the primary choice for directly addressing the cognitive aspect of somatic symptom illnesses.