Share This Link

Positioning the client supine is strictly contraindicated because it compresses the inferior vena cava, leading to severe maternal hypotension and subsequent uteroplacental insufficiency. The nurse must maintain left lateral tilt to optimize hemodynamic stability and placental perfusion.

Encouraging ambulation is inappropriate for a patient experiencing active preterm labor because physical activity can stimulate further cervical change and exacerbate uterine contractions. Bed rest and tocolytic administration are typically required to manage and halt the progression of labor.

Delaying intravenous access is unsafe practice because an acute obstetric emergency requires immediate vascular access for fluid resuscitation and medication administration. Establishing a secure intravenous line is critical for the rapid delivery of corticosteroids or tocolytics as ordered.

Aspiration risk is primarily associated with impaired laryngeal reflexes, general anesthesia, or neurological deficits, not preterm labor. Positioning a client laterally does prevent supine hypotension syndrome, but it has no physiological impact on gastroesophageal reflux or preventing pulmonary aspiration during sleep in this clinical context.

Uterine contractility in preterm labor is governed by complex endocrine and paracrine pathways involving oxytocin receptors and prostaglandins. Simply altering maternal posture via lateral positioning does not exert a direct tocolytic effect to decrease the intrinsic frequency of uterine contractions mechanically.

Vaginal examinations require specific gynecological positioning such as the lithotomy posture or a modified dorsal recumbent stance with adequate visualization and draping. The lateral position actually obscures the perineum, thereby hindering rather than facilitating clinical pelvic examinations by the primary care provider.

Choice 1 is incorrect because providing false reassurance minimizes the client's genuine anxiety and contradicts established neonatal morbidity statistics associated with delivery at 27 weeks of gestation, where significant risks like respiratory distress syndrome remain prevalent.

Choice 3 is incorrect because instructing the client to remain calm invalidates her affective state and inappropriately attributes the exacerbation of preterm uterine contractions entirely to maternal anxiety, ignoring complex underlying pathological triggers.

Choice 4 is incorrect because deflecting the client's emotional and informational needs to the provider represents a therapeutic barrier and poor communication strategy, failing to utilize the nurse's role in supportive counseling.

Discouraging inquiries regarding the neonatal intensive care unit fosters information deprivation, which exacerbates maternal anxiety and maladaptive coping mechanisms. Comprehensive psychological support mandates open communication channels to address anticipatory grief and facilitate effective adaptation during high-risk antepartum complications.

Postponing developmental discussions until after delivery increases acute stress responses and parental helplessness by inducing sudden informational shock. Establishing early collaborative dialogue allows families adequate time for psychological processing of potential neonatal morbidities and intensive care requirements.

Referring emotional concerns exclusively to pastoral care circumvents the comprehensive scope of holistic nursing practice and therapeutic communication. Nurses must directly validate parental feelings and coordinate interprofessional support teams rather than completely delegating essential psychosocial interventions.