Share This Link

This statement is poorly constructed and clinically ambiguous. A tendency to collapse when having difficulty breathing mixes separate nursing problems together rather than identifying a clear etiology. It utilizes vague symptomatology instead of isolating a precise environmental or physiological risk factor for falls.

This statement violates diagnostic rules by listing a medical diagnosis as the etiology. Stroke is a definitive medical diagnosis, which nurses cannot independently treat or resolve. The etiology must focus on the neurological impairment or neuromuscular deficits caused by the medical event rather than the medical diagnosis itself.

This statement uses incorrect linking phraseology and faulty sequencing. The term secondary to is generally reserved to connect an etiology to an underlying medical condition, but fatigue is a symptom, not a medical condition. This structure creates an illogical causal loop that undermines diagnostic precision

This format does not directly decrease health care costs. While standardized care tracking can indirectly minimize administrative redundancies over time, the primary objective of implementing this specific diagnostic framework is clinical precision and communication rather than fiscal optimization or cost containment.

This approach does not directly improve nurse-client communication. The highly specialized terminology and rigid structural mechanics of the PES format are designed specifically for intraprofessional charting and peer-to-peer transmission, rather than translating clinical concepts during therapeutic communication or client education.

This framework does not inherently focus on health and wellness elements. The PES format is predominantly utilized to structure actual or problem-focused diagnoses by requiring validating signs and symptoms, whereas wellness diagnoses utilize a modified, non-etiological structure focused on promotion tracking or readiness validation.

Excess fluid volume is the diagnostic label or problem statement. This component represents the NANDA-I validated human response to a health condition. It describes the client's current altered health state rather than the causal mechanism or contributing factor that produced the fluid retention.

The phrase decreased venous return represents the etiology. In a standard three-part or two-part diagnostic statement, the clause following related to identifies the pathogenetic mechanism or contributing factor driving the human response, which directly guides the intervention selection to address the underlying cause.:

The choice unknown is incorrect because the etiology is explicitly stated. The diagnostic statement clearly delineates the pathophysiological mechanism responsible for the fluid retention. The contributing factor is identifiable and actionable, making causal clarity apparent rather than an unspecified etiology.

(a) is written as a two-part diagnosis, not a three-part one. While it is a structurally valid nursing statement, it lacks the required "as evidenced by" segment to qualify as a complete three-part PES statement, rendering it taxonomically incomplete as a PES structure.

(c) contains a non-standard diagnostic label. "Need to learn" is not an approved NANDA-I nursing diagnosis label; it describes an educational deficit rather than an actualized human response or diagnostic label recognized by the professional taxonomy.

(e) uses a faulty etiology. Attributing caregiver strain to the failure of home health aides introduces an external, non-nursing blaming factor that distracts from the nurse's independent ability to manage the caregiver's physiological or psychological response.

This phrase represents the human response. It defines the central diagnostic problem statement. It establishes the specific taxonomic focus. This cannot serve as the underlying etiology.

This notation signifies a defining characteristic. It represents an objective data point. It provides a numeric evaluation scale. This serves as clinical diagnostic evidence.

This description constitutes an objective symptom. It displays a protective physical response. It validates the active problem focus. This represents part of the clinical evidence.