Share This Link

Clinical experiences: While personal clinical experiences are important, they are still grounded in observation and practice. They may be biased, but they are often more applicable than trial and error.

Client values and preferences: While subjective, client values are essential in shared decision-making. They do not rank in the evidence hierarchy itself but are considered alongside best evidence.

Trial and error: This is not considered valid evidence in evidence-based practice because it lacks systematic methodology, reproducibility, and scientific rigor. Decisions based on trial and error are often anecdotal and not grounded in validated research.Rationale for incorrect answers:

A study examining the bereavement process in spouses of clients with terminal cancer: This involves exploring personal experiences, emotions, and meanings, which fits qualitative research.

A study exploring factors influencing weight control behavior: While some parts could be measured, “exploring factors” often implies a qualitative approach to understand motivations and barriers.

A study examining a client’s feelings before and after a bone marrow aspiration: This involves subjective feelings and personal perception, which are typically analyzed using qualitative methods.

All research is flawed: While no study is perfect, this statement is overly broad and does not specifically address why one study alone may be insufficient to guide practice.

The research would not have taken into consideration the cost of acquiring and playing the music in a hospital: Cost analysis is relevant to feasibility but is not the primary research limitation in this scenario; the main concern is generalizability from only one study.

Research cannot demonstrate clients’ appreciation of music since research is only appropriate for physiological problems: Research can absolutely study psychological, emotional, and satisfaction-related variables; it is not limited to physiological outcomes.

Comparison to another similar treatment: That describes C (Comparison), not P.

Clearly defined, focused literature review: A literature review is a research activity, not the P element of PICO.

Specific identification of the desired outcome: That is O (Outcome), not P.

Evidence: While evidence is the product or outcome of research, it is not the foundation. Evidence is gathered after a study has been conducted, analyzed, and interpreted using a structured approach.

Experience contributes to clinical judgment, but it is not the foundation of formal research. Relying solely on experience can introduce bias and inconsistencies. Research goes beyond individual experiences to test hypotheses under controlled and repeatable conditions.

Critical thinking is essential for interpreting and applying research findings, but it is not the foundational structure upon which research is conducted. It supports research utilization, not research development itself.