Share This Link

While client opinion is relevant to patient satisfaction, it doesn't directly assess cognitive learning or skill retention. Learning effectiveness is scientifically measured by observable changes in knowledge, attitudes, or psychomotor skills, not merely subjective evaluation of the teaching method. Self-assessment can be biased and doesn't confirm the accurate internalization of the complex health information provided.

Asking the primary care provider only assesses the quality or adherence to teaching standards by the nurse, not the client's actual comprehension. It does not directly measure the client's learning outcome, which must be assessed by evaluating the client's ability to recall, explain, or demonstrate the taught information or skill.

Documenting is a legal and procedural requirement, but it is not a method of assessing whether learning has occurred. Documentation records the action of teaching and the observed learning outcome but is not the outcome measurement tool itself; the assessment must precede the documentation.

Increased fluid intake is a generic health recommendation, but it does not address the concerning systemic and localized signs occurring post-procedure, which suggests a potentially serious intrabdominal complication like perforation or peritonitis. These symptoms warrant a rapid, definitive medical evaluation to prevent further morbidity or mortality.

Increased pain, new distention, and a low-grade fever (>100.0°F is concerning post-procedure) are not normal findings two days after a colonoscopy. They are cardinal signs of post-procedure infection or bowel injury, requiring immediate medical assessment to rule out complications such as perforation of the colon.

Suggesting a simple fever reducer (e.g., acetaminophen) might mask a serious, evolving infectious or inflammatory process without addressing the underlying cause of the fever and abdominal distress. Emergent evaluation is necessary to rapidly identify and treat a potential surgical abdomen or sepsis.

Leakage of stool onto the skin is not normal and is medically significant because the effluent from a colostomy (especially ascending or transverse) contains digestive enzymes that can rapidly break down the peristomal skin barrier, leading to chemical irritation, erosion, ulceration, and potential infection (dermatitis).

Applying tape to a leaking wafer is a temporary, ineffective measure that fails to stop the leakage at its source, potentially worsening the problem by creating a tighter seal that traps effluent against the skin. The integrity of the skin-barrier seal is lost, necessitating complete removal and proper reapplication.

Documenting the finding without immediate intervention is an act of omission and professional negligence, as the leaking stool is actively causing skin damage and increasing the risk of infection. This emergent skin integrity issue requires direct, immediate action to remove the irritant and re-establish a protective barrier.

This option is incorrect because the calculation is 0.25 mg÷ 0.125 mg/tablet = 2 tablets. Administering 1.5 tablets would result in an insufficient dose of 0.1875 mg, which is a subtherapeutic dose that would not achieve the desired clinical effect of cardiac glycoside therapy on myocardial contractility and heart rate.

The order and the available medication are mathematically congruent for a whole number of tablets (2 tablets) and do not contain any ambiguity regarding the drug, dose, or route that would necessitate clarification with the prescriber. Clarification is not required when the calculation yields a standard, acceptable dose form.

Administering 3 tablets would result in a dose of 0.375 mg, which is 1.5 times the ordered dose. Digoxin has a narrow therapeutic index (normal range 0.5 to 2.0 ng/mL), and this overdose could rapidly lead to cardiac toxicity (e.g., dysrhythmias) and severe symptoms.

Interpersonal skills pertain to effective communication and interaction with others, emphasizing social learning and relationship dynamics. This domain involves developing empathy, conflict resolution, and teamwork abilities, focusing on how an individual collaborates and relates to others in a social or professional setting, which contrasts with solitary procedural practice.

The affective domain involves emotions, attitudes, values, and feelings. Learning in this area is demonstrated through changes in interest, appreciation, motivation, and the willingness to accept an idea or procedure. It addresses the emotional response to learning, such as acceptance or comfort, rather than the physical skill acquisition itself.

The cognitive domain involves intellectual skills and the acquisition of knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. This includes mental processes like recalling facts, understanding concepts, and making decisions, which is separate from the physical execution of a learned skill.

The interpersonal domain, sometimes considered a component of social learning theory, focuses on how individuals interact and communicate with others. It involves social skills, empathy, and relationship building. While motivation can be influenced by others, the internalization of motivation and the feeling of assurance primarily reside within the individual's emotional framework.

The psychomotor domain centers on the development of physical skills that require neuromuscular coordination and dexterity, like performing a return demonstration or using equipment correctly. This domain is concerned with the physical execution of a task, which is distinct from the emotional or attitudinal changes associated with being motivated and assured.

The cognitive domain relates to intellectual skills such as knowledge acquisition, comprehension, and critical thinking. While understanding the benefits is cognitive, the response that is better due to motivation and assurance highlights the emotional and attitudinal component, which is the key characteristic of the affective domain.

While vitals and a review of orders are critical patient data, they are components within the Background and Assessment steps of SBAR, not the core SBAR elements themselves. SBAR is a framework for structuring the narrative, not merely a checklist of data points, prioritizing synthesis and recommendation over a raw data list.

This choice describes elements that do not correspond to the established SBAR structure. SBAR is an acronym that strictly defines the four necessary components for a comprehensive patient handoff or urgent communication, focusing on structured data transfer and proposed action rather than general summaries or patient rights.

Subjective information is part of the Assessment and Background, and while revisions needed could be a recommendation, this choice does not accurately represent the standard, internationally recognized SBAR elements. The Assessment in SBAR is the nurse's clinical judgment, and the Recommendation is the suggested action.

A bone biopsy is a procedure where a small sample of bone tissue is extracted, typically from the iliac crest or sternum, for microscopic examination. This procedure is used to diagnose blood disorders or bone cancers, and it is entirely distinct from a lumbar puncture, which accesses the central nervous system spaces.

Arterial blood is drawn from an artery, such as the radial or femoral artery, to perform an Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) analysis, which assesses oxygenation, ventilation, and acid-base status. This procedure is fundamentally different from a lumbar puncture, both in site and purpose.

Venous blood is collected from a vein (venipuncture) to perform most common blood tests, such as complete blood counts (CBC) or basic metabolic panels (BMP). Normal lab values for a typical adult hemoglobin are 13.5-17.5 g/dL for males and 12.0-15.5 g/dL for females, and collection is not related to a lumbar puncture.