Share This Link

Saying clients are not capable of using any defense mechanisms is inaccurate. Even with dementia, individuals retain some psychological coping strategies, though they are limited and often maladaptive.

Using one method of defense for every situation oversimplifies behavior. While reliance on familiar defenses is common, clients may still vary responses depending on context, though exaggerated patterns dominate.

Attempting to develop new defense mechanisms is unlikely because dementia impairs learning and adaptability. Neurocognitive decline prevents the creation of novel coping strategies, making this option inconsistent with disease progression.

A reeducation program is ineffective because dementia impairs the ability to learn new information. Neurocognitive decline prevents successful reeducation, making this option unrealistic and inappropriate.

Introducing new leisure-time activities requires intact learning and adaptability, which are compromised in dementia. Clients benefit more from familiar routines and activities that reinforce existing skills rather than new ones.

Group therapy sessions may be overwhelming due to impaired communication and reasoning. While social support is valuable, structured supportive care tailored to individual needs is more effective than group therapy in advanced cognitive decline.

Granting excessive seclusion often results in sensory deprivation, which can paradoxically worsen disorientation and trigger hallucinations in the geriatric population. Clients with diminished cognitive capacity require frequent environmental cues and social orientation to maintain a connection with their immediate reality.

Engaging in complex social interactions frequently leads to sensory overstimulation, overwhelming the patient’s limited processing capacity and potentially causing agitation. Therapeutic activities should be highly structured and tailored to the individual’s cognitive threshold rather than relying on group dynamics.

Exposure to a wide variety of tasks or changes in routine can lead to cognitive fragmentation and significant frustration. For those with impaired memory and orientation, a predictable and repetitive schedule is essential to reduce the neurological demand and prevent behavioral outbursts.

Issuing a command to be quiet is a punitive communication style that frequently exacerbates agitation by inducing feelings of threat. This approach fails to address the underlying distress and lacks the necessary therapeutic support to help the client regain internal behavioral control.

Passive observation during an outburst is a safety violation that places the client and others at risk for physical harm. It ignores the hemodynamic strain and potential for metabolic exhaustion that occurs during prolonged periods of intense physical or emotional acting out.

Touching an agitated patient can be misinterpreted as a hostile physical restraint, potentially triggering a violent defensive response. In geriatric psychiatry, maintaining personal space is critical during de-escalation to prevent the client from feeling trapped or physically threatened.

Demanding complete self-reliance from a cognitively impaired individual is developmentally inappropriate. Since the condition involves severe executive dysfunction, the client lacks the neural capacity to organize and execute the necessary hygiene tasks independently.

Total staff intervention fosters learned helplessness, accelerating the loss of physical capability. When the nurse performs every action, the client’s remaining neural pathways for self-care undergo atrophy due to a lack of use.

Allowing poor hygiene violates infection control standards and basic health needs. Neglecting hygiene allows for the accumulation of pathogens, leading to dermal complications and potential systemic illness, which ignores the client's underlying physiological vulnerability.

While behavioral changes occur, severe aggression is more characteristic of the moderate stage rather than mild impairment. Predicting a specific emotional reaction is secondary to addressing the immediate safety hazard posed by the client’s failing cognitive and motor coordination.

Chronic sleep disturbances are common in neurodegeneration but are not the primary diagnostic indicator for driving cessation. The most significant risk factor is the loss of judgment and reaction time, rather than fatigue-related recklessness typical of younger populations.

Increased confusion during evening hours, known as nocturnal wandering or sundowning, typically intensifies as the disease progresses to middle stages. In the mild stage, the primary concern is the daytime failure of navigation and the inability to handle unexpected traffic variables.

Directing the client to the emergency department is premature without first evaluating the clinical presentation. While fluid replacement may be necessary, the nurse must first gather assessment data to justify such a high-intensity intervention for a cognitively impaired individual.

Requesting laboratory work is an appropriate secondary step, but it should not precede a symptomatic evaluation. Laboratory values like blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels confirm the diagnosis, but the initial telephone interaction must focus on the patient's immediate physiological state.

Delaying further contact until the following day is dangerous for a patient who has already been fluid-deprived for 24 hours. Given the diminished physiological reserve in an 82-year-old, waiting another day could lead to acute kidney injury or severe electrolyte imbalances.

Focusing on the need for help addresses resource allocation rather than the caregiver's internal emotional state. While it identifies a need for respite care, it does not provide diagnostic information regarding the husband’s neurovegetative or mood symptoms.

Asking if a situation is stressful often prompts a defensive or socially desirable response. Stress is an expected component of caregiving, but it is not synonymous with clinical depression, and this closed-ended approach may fail to uncover deeper psychological distress.

This statement is a presumptive generalization that can be perceived as judgmental or dismissive of the caregiver's devotion. Using declarative statements instead of therapeutic questions blocks the client from expressing their true feelings and can damage the therapeutic rapport.

Utilizing a transdermal delivery system is inappropriate for acute post-operative pain management. These patches have a slow onset of action, often taking 12 to 24 hours to reach a steady state, making them unsuitable for the immediate, intense pain following a major orthopedic procedure.

Self-directed analgesia requires the patient to have the cognitive capacity to understand the relationship between pain and the demand button. A client with advanced neurodegeneration lacks the executive function to use a PCA pump safely or effectively, leading to either overdose or significant pain.

Relying on a subjective report is ineffective because dementia patients may have aphasia or agnosia, preventing them from vocalizing discomfort. Waiting for the client to ask for medication violates the principle of proactive pain management and ignores the physiological reality of the patient’s sensory and cognitive barriers.

Interpreting a metaphorical statement evaluates abstract reasoning rather than spatial orientation. This task involves the higher-order processing of the frontal lobe and is used to assess intellectual depth and judgment rather than the client's awareness of their physical surroundings.

Recalling one's birthplace measures long-term remote memory stored in the temporal cortex. While this provides information about the client's history, it does not determine if they are currently oriented to the present location or understand their current environment in the clinic.

Mentioning recent dietary intake is a test of short-term memory and recent recall. Although memory deficits often accompany disorientation, being able to remember a meal does not confirm that the client knows where they are physically located at the time of the assessment.

Providing preferred foods addresses nutrition, which is important but secondary to safety, and does not prevent acute risks.

Encouraging socialization helps prevent isolation and improves emotional well-being, but safety takes precedence over social needs in NCD.

Supporting ADLs promotes independence, but forcing or prioritizing self-care in advanced Alzheimer’s may increase frustration or risk, making safety the primary concern first.

Incontinence requires ongoing care and hygiene maintenance, but it does not pose an immediate threat to safety compared with violent outbursts.

Self-care deficits in hygiene, dressing, and toileting are significant for quality of life, yet they are secondary to ensuring the client and others remain safe during episodes of aggression.

Altered thought processes with impaired memory are inherent in stage 2 Alzheimer’s, but cognitive impairment alone is less urgent than the risk of harm from violent behavior.

Asking how to improve memory indicates a misunderstanding of prognosis; Alzheimer’s causes irreversible cognitive decline, and no interventions can restore memory fully.

Asking about medication effectiveness suggests the daughter expects a cure or rapid improvement, which is inconsistent with the progressive, degenerative nature of the disease.

Asking about the “best treatment program” implies an expectation of curative or advanced intervention, rather than understanding that care is supportive and long-term.

Family history of Alzheimer’s disease is a significant risk factor due to genetic predisposition, particularly in early-onset forms.

Head trauma increases the risk of Alzheimer’s disease by accelerating amyloid deposition and neuronal injury, contributing to neurodegeneration.

Advanced age is the strongest risk factor; incidence rises sharply after age 65, with prevalence increasing dramatically in older populations.