Share This Link

This is a dismissive statement that provides false reassurance. It minimizes the client’s fear and blocks further communication. Such reassurance fails to acknowledge the client’s unique emotional state and does not promote trust or further dialogue.

Although discussing pain management is important, directing the client to someone else shifts responsibility away from the current therapeutic moment. It avoids exploring the client’s emotional state and does not validate her fear, which is critical at this stage.

This statement gives unsolicited advice and minimizes the client's concern. Encouraging relaxation may be helpful later, but telling a client how to feel without acknowledging her expressed fear is nontherapeutic and may shut down communication.

Providing written material alone does not ensure comprehension or engagement. It lacks interaction, does not assess understanding, and does not incorporate different learning styles, particularly the psychomotor and affective domains.

A single demonstration followed by an open-ended offer for questions may be insufficient. It assumes understanding without evaluating performance or encouraging active involvement, which is critical for adult learners.

A 30-minute lecture without interaction is passive, overwhelming, and not suitable for adult learners. It neglects individual needs, fails to assess comprehension, and may impair retention due to cognitive overload.

Providing online resources supports the teaching role but lacks interaction with other healthcare professionals. It is a one-directional approach and does not demonstrate interprofessional collaboration or coordinated care planning.

Educating the client about insulin use is part of the nurse’s educator role. While it supports adherence, it does not involve collaboration with other disciplines or demonstrate team-based care.

Administering and documenting a glucose test is a technical task that fulfills the nurse’s role in care delivery and assessment, not collaboration. It does not involve working jointly with other professionals to plan or manage care.

Telling the client to leave immediately is directive and may not be safe or realistic. It removes the client’s agency and can escalate danger if done without planning. Advocacy involves supporting the client’s choices, not dictating them.

Documentation is essential but alone is insufficient. Without further action or offering resources, this approach neglects the nurse’s duty to advocate for safety and support, especially when abuse is disclosed.

Suggesting direct confrontation is unsafe and inappropriate in situations involving emotional or controlling abuse. It may provoke retaliation and ignores the power imbalance present in abusive relationships.

Recognizing assumptions involves identifying beliefs taken for granted without evidence, such as assuming a teen mother doesn’t understand discharge instructions. However, in this case, the nurse is not just assuming but is demonstrating a specific bias, which is a deeper, more entrenched judgment.

Determining the need for closure refers to the tendency to desire a quick answer or resolution without considering all information. The nurse’s thought here is not related to premature closure or decision-making, but rather a bias-based generalization.

Becoming skillful in data management relates to the ability to collect, interpret, and analyze data accurately. This scenario does not involve mismanagement of data but a prejudgment of the client based on age.

Failure to validate data involves making clinical decisions without confirming accuracy of information, such as not double-checking assessment findings. In this scenario, the nurse is making a personal judgment, not ignoring factual validation.

Assumptions involve accepting something as true without evidence. While assumptions may be present, the thought goes beyond that—it assigns negative value to the client's beliefs, making it a bias.

Failure to determine the need for closure relates to prematurely ending decision-making or jumping to conclusions without complete analysis. Although related to faulty reasoning, the core issue here is a prejudiced attitude, not a rushed conclusion.

This outcome lacks specificity and measurability. "Pain relief" is vague and cannot be objectively evaluated without a defined scale or time frame.

This focuses on the nurse’s action, not the client’s response. Expected outcomes must describe the client’s behavior or status, not what the nurse will do.

This is too broad and subjective. "Managed effectively" is not clearly defined or measurable, and “throughout the shift” lacks a specific outcome criterion to evaluate success.

Relying on tradition rather than evidence undermines quality care. Evidence-based practice requires evaluating current data, not continuing practices just because "it’s always been done this way."

Blindly following orders without questioning or understanding the rationale opposes the research role. Nurses must think critically and question practices that may not align with current evidence.

Using outdated protocols is the opposite of evidence-based care. Research-oriented nurses advocate for updated guidelines and reject obsolete practices that could compromise safety.

Personally performing all tasks is inefficient and not reflective of a managerial role. This leads to poor delegation, time mismanagement, and underutilization of available staff.

Teaching is important but doing so without coordinating with lactation consultants or team members reflects poor interdisciplinary collaboration, which is essential in a managerial role.

Ignoring cost-containment measures reflects poor resource management. Managers are expected to deliver quality care while being fiscally responsible.

Continuing at the same pace without managing interruptions risks increased errors and impaired judgment due to mental fatigue.

Expressing frustration to colleagues may provide emotional relief but does not directly improve critical thinking or client safety in the moment.

Focusing only on one client neglects other clients’ needs and compromises comprehensive care, which can increase risk.