Share This Link

Repetitive, purposeless movements like hand-wringing are stereotypic behaviors often observed in anxiety disorders or obsessive-compulsive disorder. These actions stem from heightened psychological distress or neurological compulsions, not the slowed motor and emotional responses characteristic of psychomotor retardation. This condition, primarily linked to depression, involves reduced activity due to altered dopaminergic and serotonergic activity, making this choice incorrect.

Sudden, jerky muscle spasms are typically extrapyramidal symptoms, such as tardive dyskinesia, caused by antipsychotic medications affecting dopamine pathways in the basal ganglia. These involuntary movements are abrupt and distinct from the generalized slowing of physical and emotional responses in psychomotor retardation, which is a hallmark of depression, rendering this choice incorrect.

Rapid, involuntary movements are associated with anxiety or hyperkinetic disorders, reflecting increased autonomic arousal and motor activity. These contrast with psychomotor retardation, where patients exhibit slowed movements and emotional expression due to decreased neural activity in mood-regulating brain regions, such as the prefrontal cortex, making this choice incorrect for defining psychomotor retardation.

Flat affect describes a severe reduction or absence of emotional expression, often seen in schizophrenia or severe depression. Patients display minimal facial or vocal changes, unlike the rapid emotional shifts in the scenario. This lack of emotional variability does not match the described behavior, making this choice incorrect.

Restricted affect refers to a limited range of emotional expression, less severe than flat affect, often seen in mood disorders or personality disorders. It does not involve rapid shifts between emotions, as described in the question, but rather a consistently narrowed emotional range, making this choice incorrect.

Blunted affect involves a reduced intensity of emotional expression, common in schizophrenia or post-traumatic stress disorder. Patients show muted responses, not rapid shifts between intense emotions like laughter and crying. This does not align with the described bipolar disorder behavior, making this choice incorrect.

Labile affect involves rapid, unpredictable emotional shifts, common in bipolar disorder. It does not describe minimal facial expressions or a mismatch between verbal and nonverbal emotions, as seen in schizophrenia. The described scenario involves incongruence, not rapid changes, making this choice incorrect.

Flat affect is a near absence of emotional expression, often seen in schizophrenia, where patients show minimal facial or vocal changes. While related, it does not specifically address the mismatch between verbal emotions and minimal facial expressions described, making it less precise than inappropriate affect.

Blunted affect involves reduced intensity of emotional expression, often in schizophrenia, but does not emphasize a mismatch between verbal and nonverbal emotions. It describes a general dampening of affect, not the specific incongruence noted in the scenario, making this choice incorrect.

The Durham Rule holds that a defendant is not criminally responsible if their act was a product of mental disease. It is broad and does not specifically address the inability to control behavior despite knowing wrongfulness, making it less applicable than irresistible impulse.

The M’Naghten Rule focuses on a defendant’s inability to understand the nature or wrongfulness of their actions due to mental illness. The scenario emphasizes inability to control behavior, not lack of understanding, making this choice incorrect.

The Tarasoff Rule requires clinicians to warn potential victims of a patient’s threat, unrelated to insanity defenses. It addresses duty to protect, not the legal standard for criminal responsibility, making this choice irrelevant to the scenario.

The irresistible impulse test focuses on a defendant’s inability to control their actions due to mental illness, even if they understand the act’s wrongfulness. The scenario emphasizes the patient’s lack of understanding of wrongfulness, not impulse control, making this choice incorrect for the legal standard described.

The substantial capacity test, part of the Model Penal Code, assesses whether a defendant lacks the capacity to appreciate the criminality of their conduct or conform to the law. The scenario specifically highlights not understanding wrongfulness, aligning more directly with M’Naghten, making this less precise.

The Durham Rule states that a defendant is not criminally responsible if their act was a product of mental disease. It is broader and less specific than M’Naghten, which focuses on understanding wrongfulness, making it less applicable to the scenario described.

While therapeutic communication can help patients manage emotions, controlling outbursts is a secondary outcome, not a primary goal. It involves techniques like de-escalation, but the focus is on understanding the patient’s emotional state through active listening, not directly controlling behavior, making this choice less accurate.

Providing a plan of action is a nursing intervention, not a primary goal of therapeutic communication. Communication aims to explore patient perspectives and build trust, not to deliver directives. Plans are developed after understanding the patient’s needs, making this choice incorrect.

Informing the patient of priority problems is an educational or directive action, not a primary goal of therapeutic communication. Communication focuses on exploring patient perspectives, not imposing nurse-identified priorities, which could disrupt trust and engagement, making this choice incorrect.

Anticipatory grief occurs before an expected loss, such as during a terminal illness, where individuals mourn in advance. The scenario describes grief after a death, not before, and the issue is lack of social recognition, not anticipation, making this choice incorrect.

Complicated grief involves prolonged, intense grief that impairs functioning, often with unresolved emotions. While the woman’s sadness is significant, the key issue is the inability to mourn openly due to social stigma, not prolonged grief, making this choice incorrect.

Chronic grief refers to persistent grief without resolution, often over years. The scenario does not indicate a prolonged duration but rather the social barrier to mourning a non-recognized relationship, aligning with disenfranchised grief, not chronic grief, making this choice incorrect.

Expressing empathy, such as acknowledging the difficulty of the loss, fosters a therapeutic connection. It validates the patient’s emotions, encouraging open expression of grief, which is essential for processing loss and aligns with therapeutic communication principles, making this choice therapeutic.

Asking the patient to elaborate on their feelings is a therapeutic open-ended question. It promotes exploration of emotions, facilitating grief processing by engaging the patient’s prefrontal cortex in reflecting on their experience, making this a therapeutic response and incorrect for the question.

Offering support and encouraging discussion is therapeutic, as it builds trust and validates the patient’s experience. This response engages the patient in processing grief, supporting emotional regulation through empathetic communication, making it a therapeutic response and incorrect for the question.