Share This Link

Storing collected urine at room temperature is incorrect. Urine collected for a 24-hour urine test must be stored in a cool environment, ideally refrigerated, to prevent bacterial growth and the breakdown of urine components. This ensures the urine sample remains stable and accurate for analysis. Storing at room temperature can compromise test accuracy and lead to false results.

Documenting any missed urine collection is a good practice, but it doesn't directly impact the initial test process. The primary goal is to ensure all urine is collected accurately within the 24-hour window. Missed collections should be minimized to maintain the test's integrity. While documenting is important for transparency and understanding test discrepancies, it is not the immediate action the nurse should take when starting the test.

Posting a notice on the client's door helps remind healthcare team members about the ongoing 24-hour urine collection. This prevents disruptions and ensures all urine output is collected accurately. However, this action, while important, supports the process rather than directly initiating the test. The nurse can post the notice to ensure everyone involved is aware, but it is not the first step in beginning the urine collection.

Bed rest is not recommended for clients with urolithiasis because movement can help the passage of stones. Encouraging ambulation can aid in moving the stone and may help it pass more quickly.

A high protein diet is not typically recommended for clients with urolithiasis. Excessive protein intake can increase the risk of kidney stone formation, particularly in those susceptible to uric acid stones.

A decrease in urine output is not expected and can indicate a complication such as obstruction. The goal is to maintain or increase urine output to help flush out the stone and prevent complications.

Encouraging fluid intake to increase urine output is not the most effective intervention for managing urinary incontinence. While adequate hydration is important, simply increasing fluid intake can exacerbate the symptoms of incontinence and lead to more frequent episodes of urine leakage.

Providing frequent reminders for the client to use the restroom can be helpful in managing incontinence, especially in individuals who may have cognitive impairments or are forgetful. However, it is not the most effective intervention compared to exercises that strengthen the pelvic floor muscles.

Limiting the client's access to the restroom to promote bladder control is not an appropriate intervention. This approach can increase the risk of urinary retention and lead to complications such as urinary tract infections. It is more important to promote regular voiding patterns and encourage the use of techniques that improve bladder control.

While monitoring blood pressure before and after hemodialysis is essential to assess the client's cardiovascular stability, it is not a direct measure of fluid loss. Blood pressure changes can be influenced by various factors such as fluid status, vascular resistance, and cardiac output, but they do not provide a precise measurement of fluid removal.

Neck vein distention can indicate fluid overload or changes in intravascular volume, but it is not a precise method for quantifying fluid loss during hemodialysis. Neck vein distention is a subjective assessment and can be influenced by factors such as body position and venous pressure, making it less reliable for determining exact fluid loss.

Abdominal girth measurement is typically used to assess ascites or abdominal distension, not fluid loss during hemodialysis. It is not a relevant measurement for clients undergoing hemodialysis, as it does not provide information about the volume of fluid removed during the treatment. Abdominal girth changes are more relevant for conditions such as liver disease or gastrointestinal issues.

Starting the flow of urine before passing the container under the stream to collect the specimen is an appropriate instruction. This technique is recommended to ensure that the initial part of the urine, which may contain contaminants from the urethral opening, is not collected. By allowing the first part of the urine to flow into the toilet, the midstream portion is considered cleaner and more representative for diagnostic testing.

Removing the specimen container before stopping the stream of urine is also an appropriate instruction. This helps to ensure that only the midstream portion of the urine is collected, minimizing the risk of contamination from the skin or other surfaces. It also prevents the urine from splashing or overflowing, which could potentially contaminate the sample or the surrounding area.

Instructing the client to use their non-dominant hand to spread the labia is an appropriate instruction. This technique helps to ensure that the urinary meatus is exposed and that the urine flows directly into the specimen container. Using the non-dominant hand allows the dominant hand to be used for holding and positioning the specimen container, making the process more manageable and reducing the risk of contamination.

While the patient who is unable to obtain fluids independently is at risk for dehydration, which can lead to urinary tract infections, the immediate risk of urosepsis is lower compared to a patient with an indwelling catheter. Ensuring adequate fluid intake is important, but this condition does not present the same direct risk of bacterial entry into the urinary system as an indwelling catheter does.

The patient who has undergone surgery for placement of an ileostomy does not have a direct connection to the urinary system that would increase the risk of urosepsis. While this patient might require monitoring for postoperative complications and hydration status, the focus is not specifically on urosepsis.

The patient with continuous urinary incontinence is at risk for skin breakdown and potential urinary tract infections due to constant moisture and bacteria in contact with the skin. However, the risk of urosepsis is not as immediate or direct as it is with an indwelling catheter. Regular skin care and monitoring for signs of infection are necessary, but the focus on urosepsis is less urgent than for a patient with a catheter.

White rice is not a significant source of potassium. While it provides carbohydrates and some vitamins, it does not help to increase potassium levels, which is crucial for a client taking furosemide, a diuretic that can cause potassium depletion.

Cheddar cheese, while nutritious, is also low in potassium. It provides calcium and protein but does not significantly contribute to increasing potassium levels. For clients needing to boost their potassium intake, other foods rich in potassium are more appropriate.

Cabbage, although a healthy vegetable, is not high in potassium. It offers vitamins and fiber but does not provide the necessary potassium levels needed for someone with a low serum potassium level. Hence, it is not the best option for this client's dietary needs.

Serum creatinine is not used to measure liver enzymes. Liver function is assessed through different tests, including measurements of enzymes such as alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). These enzymes indicate liver health and function but are unrelated to serum creatinine levels.

Evaluating thyroid function involves measuring specific thyroid hormones and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), not serum creatinine. Thyroid function tests help diagnose and monitor conditions like hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism, but they do not provide information about kidney function or serum creatinine levels.

Monitoring blood glucose levels is crucial for managing diabetes, but it is unrelated to serum creatinine. Blood glucose levels are measured using specific tests like fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, and oral glucose tolerance tests. These tests help manage blood sugar but do not assess kidney function.

Administering the IV dye and closely monitoring the client for any allergic reactions is not the appropriate action. If the client has a known allergy to the dye, administering it can provoke a severe allergic reaction, including anaphylaxis, which can be life-threatening. Preemptively administering the dye without addressing the allergy can lead to significant risk for the patient and is not recommended.

Administering a small test dose of the IV dye to determine if the client has a reaction is also inappropriate. A known allergy to IV dye should not be tested in this way, as even a small amount can trigger an allergic response. Allergic reactions to IV dye can be severe and testing the reaction is not a safe or effective approach.

Continuing with the CT scan as scheduled since IV dye allergies are rare and unlikely to occur is incorrect. If a client has a known allergy, disregarding this and proceeding with the scan poses a significant risk. Even if such allergies are rare, they can be severe, and patient safety protocols must be followed to prevent harm.