Share This Link

"Solcan have shade over my sandbox.”. This response does not demonstrate animism, as it simply attributes a practical purpose to leaves (providing shade) without imbuing them with human-like qualities or intentions.

"To hide behind when they are scared.”. This response also does not reflect animism but rather assigns a functional role to leaves in a protective context.

"For the squirrels to play in.”. This response does not involve animism and instead ascribes a purpose for leaves related to the behavior of squirrels.

"Thumb-sucking is detrimental to the eruption of the child's teeth and must be stopped as soon as possible.”. This response is not the most helpful because it can create unnecessary anxiety for the father and the child. While prolonged thumb-sucking can affect dental development, it's not an urgent concern in most cases.

"Over-the-counter treatments that give a bad taste can be placed on the thumb to discourage the practice.”. This option suggests using a topical solution to discourage thumb-sucking. While it's a valid approach, it may not be necessary for most children, and a more conservative approach (choice B) is often preferable.

"Consistently touching the child's fingers whenever he sucks his thumb is most effective.”. This response may not be as effective or practical as choice B, which advises patience. Constantly touching the child's fingers may disrupt their comfort without necessarily leading to a cessation of thumb-sucking.

Mixing foods together is not recommended when introducing solid foods to infants. This approach can make it challenging to identify the cause of any adverse reactions or allergies. If a parent mixes multiple foods and the child has a negative reaction, it becomes difficult to pinpoint which specific food caused the problem. Therefore, it's best to introduce one food at a time, as advised in choice A, to monitor the child's response effectively.

Eliminating a refused food from the diet is not a suitable approach for introducing solid foods to infants. Refusing a new food is a common response in infants who are still getting used to the taste and texture of solid foods. It's important not to eliminate the food altogether, as it may take several attempts before the child accepts it. Parents should be encouraged to reintroduce the refused food at a later time. The focus should be on gradual exposure and persistence.

Beginning with one tablespoon of food is not a recommended approach. Infants should start with small amounts of solid foods and gradually increase the quantity as they become more accustomed to the new textures and flavors. Starting with a larger portion can overwhelm the child and may lead to refusal or choking. A gradual introduction, as suggested in choice A, is a safer and more appropriate method.

While it's important to provide appropriate food quantities for children, advising that food quantities must be carefully measured to avoid overfeeding may be overly restrictive. Children's appetites can vary, and strict measurements may not be necessary. Instead, it's essential to offer a balanced diet with a variety of foods and let the child's hunger cues guide their intake. Overemphasis on precise measurements may lead to unnecessary stress for both parents and children.

Stating that a toddler should eat three balanced meals and snacks are not necessary oversimplifies the feeding recommendations. While balanced meals are important, toddlers have varying energy needs, and some may require snacks to maintain their energy levels. Snacks can be an essential part of a toddler's diet, especially if there is a long gap between meals. Therefore, it's important to consider individual needs and not dismiss snacks outright.

Serving sizes should not exceed 1 teaspoon of each type of food is overly restrictive and may not provide toddlers with the necessary nutrition. While it's crucial to introduce foods in appropriate portions, limiting serving sizes to just one teaspoon may not meet the nutritional needs of a growing child. This approach may lead to underfeeding and nutrient deficiencies, which is not advisable for healthy development. A more balanced and flexible guideline, such as the one provided in choice B, is a better recommendation.

Suggesting that toddlers should be able to stay dry for 2 hours before beginning bladder training is too early. Most toddlers do not develop full bladder control until around the age of 3. Starting training too early may lead to frustration for both the child and the parents. It's essential to be patient and wait until the child is developmentally ready, which is typically around the age of 3.

Suggesting that toddlers should be able to stay dry for 4 hours before beginning bladder training may be overly restrictive and not necessary. While some children may achieve this level of bladder control, it is not a standard benchmark for readiness. Waiting for 4 hours may delay the start of bladder training unnecessarily for some children.

Suggesting that toddlers should be able to stay dry for 5 hours before beginning bladder training is too long and not a practical guideline. Waiting for such an extended period before initiating training is not developmentally appropriate, and it may lead to difficulties and accidents. It's important to strike a balance between waiting for readiness and not delaying training for an extended period, as suggested in choice B.

Stating that "My stairway is always free of clutter" indicates a good understanding of safety, as a clutter-free stairway reduces the risk of accidents. This choice shows awareness of safety measures.

Keeping medications in a locked cabinet is a responsible practice, ensuring that children do not have easy access to potentially harmful substances. This choice reflects a commitment to safety.

Stating, "I continue to provide a great deal of indirect supervision for my child," is a positive sign that the parent is actively engaged in supervising their child. This choice demonstrates a good understanding of the importance of supervision and safety.

A large construction set may have small parts that could be a choking hazard for a 3-year-old. It's essential to select toys that do not pose such risks and are developmentally appropriate. Therefore, this choice is not the most appropriate toy for a 3-year-old.

A small pet, such as a goldfish, is not an appropriate toy for a 3-year-old. Pets are living creatures that require care and attention. Introducing a pet to a young child should be a well-considered decision made by the family and not seen as a toy choice.

A board game is typically too complex for a 3-year-old to fully enjoy and understand. Board games often require following rules, taking turns, and using fine motor skills that may not be well-developed in a child of this age. Therefore, it is not the most appropriate choice.

A large construction set may have small parts that can be a choking hazard for a 3-year-old. Safety is a paramount concern when selecting toys for young children, so this choice is not the most appropriate.

A small pet, such as a goldfish, is not a suitable toy for a 3-year-old. Pets require care and responsibility, and introducing a pet should be a well-considered decision made by the family, not a toy choice.

A board game is usually too complex for a 3-year-old. Board games involve rules, taking turns, and fine motor skills that may not be well-developed in children of this age. It is not the most appropriate choice for a 3-year-old. .

Prehension ability refers to the general ability to grasp objects but does not specifically describe the pincer grasp. While the infant is displaying a form of prehension by picking up cereal, the pincer grasp is a more specific and advanced skill.

A grasp reflex is an automatic and involuntary response to touch, and it is typically present in newborns but should disappear as the infant develops. The behavior described in the question is not a grasp reflex, as it involves a deliberate use of the index finger and thumb.

The parachute reflex is a protective reflex that appears later in infancy and involves extending the arms when the infant feels like they are falling. It is not relevant to the described behavior of picking up cereal with the fingers.