Share This Link

Longitudinal studies follow the same group of subjects over a long period, which may not be feasible or practical for investigating the immediate effects of teaching.

Cross-sectional studies examine different groups at a single point in time and may not provide the best indication of the effects of teaching over time.

Descriptive studies aim to describe characteristics or behaviors of a population but do not typically involve interventions or manipulation of variables.

Quantitative research typically involves the measurement of variables using numerical data, which may not capture the nuanced experiences and explanations of coping abilities as effectively as qualitative methods.

Observational field notes may provide valuable insights into behaviors and interactions but may not capture clients' explanations of their coping abilities in the same depth as interviews.

While scores from a psychological instrument measuring hardiness provide quantitative data, they may not fully capture clients' explanations of their coping abilities and the context of their experiences.

Findings typically present the results of the study, not background information or existing literature.

Conclusions summarize the study's findings and their implications, not background information or existing literature.

Methodology describes the methods used to conduct the study, not background information or existing literature.

This question focuses on the correlation between pet ownership and medication adherence, but it may not address significant nursing concerns or contribute significantly to nursing practice.

While this question addresses an aspect of medication adherence, it focuses on client behavior during vacation and may not be directly relevant to nursing practice or interventions.

This question focuses on client preferences for flavored syrups, which may be of interest but does not directly address medication adherence or nursing practice.

Developing eligibility criteria for populations is not typically a reason for using samples instead of populations.

While data from a sample can sometimes be more manageable and easier to analyze, it's not accurate to say they are inherently more accurate than data from a population.

Populations can be stratified, but sampling allows researchers to select specific subgroups of interest from a population, making it easier to study specific characteristics or variables.

This statement describes a task performed by practical nurses but does not specify the employment status or other criteria relevant to the research question.

This statement describes a specific role (certified nurse practitioner) but does not specify the employment status or other criteria relevant to the research question.

This statement describes employees of a hospital but does not specify the role or employment status of the individuals, which is necessary for the operational definition in the research question.

Developing a system for reporting workplace violence anonymously may be beneficial, but it is not directly supported by the findings of the study. It's important to first review the hospital's definition of workplace violence before implementing changes to reporting systems.

Repeating the study at the nurse manager's hospital may not be necessary and could be resource-intensive. Reviewing the existing literature and findings from other institutions can provide valuable insights without the need for replication.

Encouraging peer support among the nursing staff to report issues is a good practice, but it may not address the specific findings of the study regarding factors associated with reporting workplace violence.

This study involves a qualitative approach comparing responses of different racial groups about pain perception, which does not involve unethical practice.

This study involves a retrospective chart audit, which does not involve unethical practice.

This study involves comparing responses about expectations of postoperative pain between male and female clients, which does not involve unethical practice.

While interviews with the adolescents' parents may provide valuable insights, they do not directly capture the adolescents' experiences with stress reduction techniques, which is the focus of the study.

Videos of the adolescents using stress reduction techniques could offer observational data, but they may not capture the subjective experiences and feelings of the adolescents themselves, which are central to a qualitative study.

Glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) findings provide objective physiological data related to diabetes management but do not capture the adolescents' experiences with stress reduction techniques, which is the focus of the study.

Older residents and those who live in community-dwellings are the population of interest but are not the variables being examined in this study.

Those who live in community-dwellings is a descriptor of the population rather than a variable being examined in the study.

Nutritional health is a concept being explored but is not the dependent variable specifically mentioned in the purpose statement.