Share This Link

Checking the reading after the other nurse leaves the room is incorrect because it does not address the immediate need for accurate data and doesn't ensure that the initial readings were correct. It's important to act promptly to verify the accuracy of the readings to ensure patient safety.

Documenting a pulse deficit of 16 beats per minute is incorrect. While there seems to be a difference of 16 beats per minute between the apical and radial pulses, it's essential to confirm this discrepancy with further assessment rather than immediately documenting it. Documentation should be based on accurate and verified data.

Report the results of the deficit to the healthcare provider is incorrect. Reporting the results to the healthcare provider without confirming the accuracy of the initial readings may lead to unnecessary alarm or inappropriate interventions. It's important to ensure the data is reliable before escalating to the healthcare provider.

White blood cell count (WBC) is incorrect. Melena, which is the passage of black, tarry stools, is typically associated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding rather than an infection. While changes in WBC count might occur in response to infection or inflammation, it is not the primary laboratory test to monitor in response to melena.

Glucose is incorrect.
Glucose monitoring is important for assessing blood sugar levels, particularly in diabetic patients or those at risk of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia. However, it is not directly related to the presence of melena, which indicates gastrointestinal bleeding.

Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) is incorrect. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels can indicate renal function and hydration status, but they are not specifically related to the presence of melena. Monitoring BUN may be relevant in other clinical contexts, such as assessing kidney function or dehydration, but it's not the primary laboratory test to monitor in response to melena.

Having the client sign a consent for treatment is not appropriate. In emergency situations where a patient's life or health is in immediate danger, obtaining written consent may not be feasible or appropriate. The priority is to provide necessary medical treatment and stabilize the patient's condition. Consent may be obtained verbally if possible, but it should not delay urgent interventions.

Contacting the client's next of kin to obtain consent for treatment is not appropriate. While it's important to involve the patient's family or next of kin in decision-making when possible, obtaining consent from them in an emergency may not be practical or timely. The focus should be on providing immediate medical care to stabilize the patient.

Notifying risk management before initiating treatment is not appropriate. Risk management concerns are important in healthcare settings, but in emergency situations where a patient's life is at risk, the priority is to provide urgent medical care. Risk management can be addressed after the patient has been stabilized.

Laboratory test results is incorrect. While laboratory test results may be relevant to the client's care, they are not typically included in discharge documentation unless there are specific instructions or follow-up related to these results. Generally, the focus of discharge documentation is on providing instructions and information necessary for the client's continued care at home.

Acuity level of client care is incorrect. The acuity level of client care may be important for internal communication within the healthcare facility, but it is not typically included in discharge documentation to be provided to the client for home care.

Do-not-resuscitate status is incorrect. While this information is critical for the client's medical care, it may already be documented in the client's medical records. It's important to ensure that the client's wishes regarding resuscitation are documented and communicated as appropriate, but it may not be included in the discharge documentation provided directly to the client.

The client needs to have someone come in to help her bathe at home is incorrect. While this indicates a need for assistance with activities of daily living, such as bathing, it does not necessarily require the involvement of a social worker. This need may be addressed by home health aides or other community resources.

The client needs to have range-of-motion exercises to assist with ambulation is incorrect. This suggests a need for rehabilitation or physical therapy services, which would typically be addressed by a physical therapist rather than a social worker.

The client needs to have someone bring oxygen tanks and equipment to her home is incorrect. While this indicates a need for assistance with arranging for medical equipment, such as oxygen tanks, it may be more closely related to coordination with home healthcare services or medical equipment providers rather than the role of a social worker.

The client has four new medications is incorrect. While the addition of new medications may require monitoring and adjustment, it does not directly indicate a need for occupational therapy. Medication management is typically addressed by the healthcare provider or pharmacist.

The client has extreme difficulty swallowing is incorrect. This finding suggests dysphagia, which may require intervention from a speech-language pathologist rather than an occupational therapist. Speech-language pathologists specialize in assessing and treating swallowing difficulties.

The client is experiencing dysarthria is incorrect. Dysarthria refers to difficulty in speaking due to weakness or poor coordination of the muscles used for speech. While it may affect communication and daily activities, it is primarily addressed through speech therapy rather than occupational therapy.

A client who has Type 1 diabetes and uses an insulin pump is incorrect. While managing Type 1 diabetes requires coordination among healthcare providers, the use of an insulin pump alone may not necessitate an interdisciplinary conference unless there are specific concerns or issues that require input from multiple disciplines.

A client who is receiving heparin and has an aPTT of 34 seconds is incorrect. Monitoring heparin therapy and adjusting doses based on laboratory values such as activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is typically within the purview of the nursing and medical team. An interdisciplinary conference may not be necessary unless there are complications or concerns that require input from other healthcare professionals.

A client who has orthostatic hypotension and is receiving IV fluids is incorrect. Orthostatic hypotension and IV fluid management are often managed primarily by the nursing and medical team. While input from other disciplines may be valuable in certain cases, it may not warrant scheduling an interdisciplinary conference unless there are specific complexities or challenges that require input from multiple disciplines.

Completing an incident report is inappropriate. While completing an incident report is important for documenting any errors or deviations from the standard of care, it should not be the first action taken. Assessing the client's condition takes precedence to ensure their immediate safety and well-being.

Notifying the provider is inappropriate. Notifying the provider may be necessary, but it should not be the first action taken. Initially, the nurse should assess the client's condition to determine if any adverse effects have occurred as a result of the additional medication dose.

Informing the nursing supervisor is inappropriate. Informing the nursing supervisor may be appropriate, especially if further actions or investigations are needed. However, the immediate priority is to assess the client's condition to ensure their safety.

Fidelity is inappropriate. Fidelity refers to the obligation to fulfill commitments and responsibilities. While important in maintaining trust and professional relationships, fidelity may not directly apply to the situation described.

Nonmaleficence is inappropriate. Nonmaleficence is the principle of doing no harm. In this situation, ensuring the safety and well-being of the client is paramount, and failing to use a gait belt could potentially lead to harm. However, the primary issue in this scenario is the accuracy and completeness of the incident report rather than the act of causing harm.

Beneficence is inappropriate. Beneficence is the principle of doing good and acting in the best interest of the client. While ensuring the use of a gait belt aligns with promoting the client's safety and well-being, the primary concern in this scenario is the integrity and honesty in reporting the incident accurately.