What is the cardiac output of a patient whose heart rate is 72 beats per minute with a stroke volume of 90 mL/contraction?

This method, known as the 6-second method, involves counting the number of QRS complexes in a 6-second interval on the electrocardiogram (ECG) strip and then multiplying that number by 10 to calculate the heart rate per minute. The advantage of this method is that it provides a relatively quick estimate of the heart rate.
A. Printing a 1-minute ECG strip and counting the number of QRS complexes in (option A) is incorrect because it can be time-consuming and may not be practical in situations where a quick estimate is needed.
B. Calculating the number of small squares between one QRS complex and the next and dividing into 1500 in (option B) is incorrect because it is a method used to calculate heart rate, known as the "1500 method," but it is not as quick as the 6-second method and requires more time and measurement precision.
D. Counting the number of large squares in the R-R interval and dividing by 300 is another method used to calculate heart rate, known as the "300 method," but it is also less quick and less accurate for assessing heart rate in patients with regular rhythms.
It's important to note that if the heart rhythm is irregular, these methods may not provide an accurate estimate of the heart rate, and a longer monitoring period or a different approach may be necessary.

Septic shock is a life-threatening condition characterized by severe infection, systemic inflammation, and inadequate tissue perfusion. In this critical situation, one of the initial priorities is to restore intravascular volume and improve tissue perfusion. Initiation of an intravenous line allows for the administration of fluids and other necessary medications to support the patient's hemodynamic stability.
While the other interventions mentioned are also important components of septic shock management, the immediate priority is to address hypotension and tissue hypoperfusion through fluid resuscitation:
A. Obtaining wound and blood cultures in (option A) is incorrect because: Cultures are important to identify the source and causative organisms of the infection. However, fluid resuscitation should take priority over obtaining cultures, as it is necessary to stabilize the patient's hemodynamics.
B. Removing or controlling potentially infected sources in (option B) is incorrect because: Identifying and controlling the source of infection is crucial in septic shock management to prevent further progression. However, initiating fluid resuscitation is more time-sensitive and should be prioritized.
D. Drawing blood for hematology and chemistry studies in (option D) is incorrect because Laboratory studies are important for evaluating organ function and guiding treatment. However, the immediate focus should be on fluid resuscitation to address the underlying hypoperfusion and stabilize the patient's condition.
Therefore, the intervention considered a priority when treating a patient who presents with septic shock is the initiation of an intravenous line and fluid administration to restore intravascular volume and improve tissue perfusion.