Which of the following interventions is considered a priority when treating a patient who presents with septic shock?

In septic shock, prompt administration of antibiotics is crucial in order to target the underlying infection and prevent further progression of the septic process. Antibiotics help to eradicate the causative organisms and reduce the bacterial load, which can help improve patient outcomes.
While all the options mentioned are important interventions in the management of septic shock, initiating antibiotic therapy is considered a priority in order to address the underlying infection and prevent sepsis-related complications.
A. Giving a 2000 mL normal saline bolus in (option A) is incorrect because: Fluid resuscitation is important in septic shock to restore intravascular volume, but antibiotic therapy takes precedence as it directly targets the underlying infection.
B. Starting an insulin drip to maintain blood glucose at 110 to 150 mg/dL in (option B) is incorrect because Glycemic control is important in septic shock, but it is not the first priority compared to addressing the infection.
C. Giving acetaminophen (Tylenol) 650 mg rectally in (option C) is incorrect because Antipyretic medications can help reduce fever, but they do not address the underlying infection or stabilize the patient's condition.
E. Starting norepinephrine (Levophed) to keep systolic blood pressure >90 mm Hg in (option E) is incorrect because: Vasopressor support may be necessary in septic shock to maintain adequate blood pressure, but initiating antibiotics takes priority in order to address the underlying infection.
Therefore, in a patient with septic shock presenting with the given signs and symptoms, the nurse should first implement the intervention of giving the prescribed antibiotics to target the underlying infection.

This method, known as the 6-second method, involves counting the number of QRS complexes in a 6-second interval on the electrocardiogram (ECG) strip and then multiplying that number by 10 to calculate the heart rate per minute. The advantage of this method is that it provides a relatively quick estimate of the heart rate.
A. Printing a 1-minute ECG strip and counting the number of QRS complexes in (option A) is incorrect because it can be time-consuming and may not be practical in situations where a quick estimate is needed.
B. Calculating the number of small squares between one QRS complex and the next and dividing into 1500 in (option B) is incorrect because it is a method used to calculate heart rate, known as the "1500 method," but it is not as quick as the 6-second method and requires more time and measurement precision.
D. Counting the number of large squares in the R-R interval and dividing by 300 is another method used to calculate heart rate, known as the "300 method," but it is also less quick and less accurate for assessing heart rate in patients with regular rhythms.
It's important to note that if the heart rhythm is irregular, these methods may not provide an accurate estimate of the heart rate, and a longer monitoring period or a different approach may be necessary.