An occupational health nurse is implementing some tertiary levels of prevention in the workplace. Which of the following interventions are tertiary interventions?

Choice A: Nominal Group Planning is Best Used in Situations Where the Final Decision is Made by the Nurse Leading the Team
This statement is incorrect. Nominal group planning, also known as the nominal group technique (NGT), is designed to facilitate group decision-making and ensure that all members have an equal opportunity to contribute their ideas. It is not intended for situations where a single individual, such as the nurse leading the team, makes the final decision. Instead, NGT aims to gather diverse perspectives and reach a collective agreement on priorities.

Choice B: Nominal Group Planning is Used for Group Exploration to Allow for the Exchange of Dialogue and Opinions by the Stakeholders
This statement is correct. Nominal group planning is a structured method for group brainstorming that encourages contributions from everyone and facilitates quick agreement on the relative importance of issues, problems, or solutions. It allows for the exchange of dialogue and opinions among stakeholders, ensuring that all voices are heard and considered in the decision-making process.

Choice C: Nominal Group Planning Involves Group Consensus Before Prioritizing Data
While nominal group planning does involve group discussion and the sharing of ideas, it does not necessarily require full consensus before prioritizing data. Instead, it uses a voting system to rank the ideas based on their importance. This method ensures that the most critical issues are identified and prioritized, even if there is not complete agreement among all participants.

Choice D: Nominal Group Planning is Authoritarian with the Key Stakeholder Dictating Prioritization of Community Data
This statement is incorrect. Nominal group planning is not an authoritarian process. It is designed to be democratic and inclusive, allowing all group members to participate equally in the decision-making process. The key stakeholder does not dictate the prioritization of community data; instead, the group collectively determines the priorities through discussion and voting.

Choice A: Prevalence Rate
The prevalence rate measures the total number of cases of a disease or health condition in a population at a specific point in time or over a specified period. It is expressed as a proportion of the population. While useful for understanding the burden of disease, the prevalence rate does not provide information on the number of deaths, making it unsuitable for calculating mortality data.

Choice B: Case Fatality Rate
The case fatality rate (CFR) is the proportion of individuals diagnosed with a particular disease who die from that disease within a specified period. It is expressed as a percentage. While CFR provides insight into the severity of a disease, it does not give the overall number of deaths in a population, nor does it specify the age group affected.

Choice C: Age-Specific Mortality Rate
The age-specific mortality rate is the number of deaths in a specific age group per 100,000 population in that age group over a given period. This measure is ideal for calculating the number of deaths among school-age children, as it provides detailed mortality data specific to that age group. By using this rate, the nurse can accurately determine the mortality rate for school-age children in the county.

Choice D: Cause-Specific Mortality Rate
The cause-specific mortality rate is the number of deaths from a specific cause per 100,000 population in a given year. While this measure is useful for understanding the impact of specific diseases or conditions, it does not provide a comprehensive view of mortality across different age groups. Therefore, it is not the best choice for calculating the overall number of deaths among school-age children.