A nurse works with a patient to establish goals/outcomes. The nurse believes that one outcome suggested by the patient is not in the patient’s best interest. What is the nurse’s best action?
Remain silent and add the suggested outcome to the plan
Formulate a more appropriate outcome without the patient’s input
Explore with the patient possible consequences of the outcome
Educate the patient that the outcome is not realistic
The Correct Answer is C
Choice A reason: Silently adding an inappropriate outcome disregards patient safety and autonomy. Outcomes must align with neurobiological needs, like serotonin modulation for depression. This approach fails to engage the patient in decision-making, risking ineffective treatment and neglecting evidence-based collaborative care principles.
Choice B reason: Formulating outcomes without patient input violates autonomy. Collaborative goal-setting, considering neurobiological factors like dopamine imbalances, ensures patient engagement and effective treatment. Excluding the patient disregards their perspective, reducing adherence and therapeutic alliance, making this approach contrary to evidence-based psychiatric nursing.
Choice C reason: Exploring consequences respects autonomy while guiding patients toward safe outcomes. Discussing implications, like medication non-adherence worsening dopamine-driven symptoms, fosters informed decisions. This collaborative approach aligns with cognitive-behavioral principles and neurobiological treatment needs, ensuring effective, patient-centered care in psychiatric practice.
Choice D reason: Educating that an outcome is unrealistic may dismiss patient autonomy. While addressing neurobiological realities, like serotonin deficits, is important, unilateral education risks disengagement. Collaborative exploration of consequences is more effective, promoting informed choices and adherence, making this option less suitable than discussion.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: Interventions, like offering snacks, address identified problems (e.g., forgetting to eat) to meet nutritional needs. This action targets physiological deficits, potentially linked to cognitive impairments from low acetylcholine in dementia, ensuring adequate caloric intake to support brain function and overall health in the care plan.
Choice B reason: Planning/goals outline desired outcomes, not specific actions. Forgetting to eat, possibly due to frontal lobe dysfunction, requires goals like “maintain adequate nutrition.” Interventions, not goals, specify actions like offering snacks, making this section incorrect for the statement’s placement in the care plan.
Choice C reason: Assessment involves data collection, like observing eating patterns, not actions like offering snacks. Forgetting to eat may reflect cognitive deficits, but assessment identifies the problem, not solutions. This section precedes interventions, making it an incorrect location for the described statement.
Choice D reason: Diagnosis identifies problems, like “impaired nutrition” due to cognitive deficits, not specific actions. Offering snacks is an intervention to address the diagnosis, not the diagnosis itself. This section is incorrect for the statement, which belongs in the intervention phase of the care plan.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: Nurses must adhere to professional standards, ensuring safe care despite substandard policies. Restraint use, for example, must minimize harm and respect patient dignity, regardless of policy. This aligns with ethical principles and evidence-based practices for managing agitation linked to neurotransmitter imbalances, upholding nurse accountability.
Choice B reason: Leaving the premises after informing a supervisor abandons patients, violating ethical duties. Professional standards require nurses to advocate for safe practices, like appropriate restraint use for dopamine-driven agitation, within the system. This option is impractical and neglects patient care responsibilities, making it incorrect.
Choice C reason: Agency policies do not override professional standards. Nurses are accountable to evidence-based practices, ensuring interventions like restraints for severe agitation are safe and ethical. Policies may guide but cannot excuse deviations from standards addressing neurobiological safety needs, making this option scientifically and ethically incorrect.
Choice D reason: Judicial interpretation varies, but nursing practice is guided by professional standards, not unpredictable legal outcomes. Standards ensure safe, ethical care, like minimizing restraint use for serotonin-related agitation, regardless of policy or judicial variability. This option is irrelevant to guiding daily nursing practice.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.