“I’m concerned whether we are behaving ethically by restraining one patient to prevent them from self-mutilating while placing another patient on one-on-one supervision to prevent them from self-mutilating.” Which ethical principle most clearly applies to this situation?

Choice A reason: Active suicidality, linked to severe serotonin deficits, requires inpatient hospitalization for constant monitoring to ensure safety. Partial hospitalization is insufficient for acute risk, as it lacks 24-hour supervision, making this patient inappropriate for this less intensive care setting.

Choice B reason: Agoraphobia and panic episodes, driven by norepinephrine surges, benefit from partial hospitalization’s structured psychoeducation and therapy. Relaxation techniques reduce amygdala hyperactivity, supporting outpatient management with daily support, making this patient suitable for partial hospitalization’s intensive, non-residential treatment.

Choice C reason: Stable lithium levels indicate controlled bipolar disorder, not requiring partial hospitalization. Regular follow-up manages neurotransmitter balance, suitable for outpatient care. Partial hospitalization is for active symptoms, not stable patients, making this an incorrect referral choice.

Choice D reason: Alcohol use concerns suggest outpatient substance abuse programs, not partial hospitalization. While dopamine reward pathways are involved, partial hospitalization targets acute psychiatric symptoms, not substance issues alone, making this patient unsuitable for this level of care.

Choice A reason: This question verifies the nurse’s interpretation, ensuring accurate understanding of concerns linked to emotional dysregulation, possibly from serotonin imbalances. It promotes therapeutic communication, engaging prefrontal cortex processing to clarify patient emotions, reducing miscommunication and fostering trust in psychiatric interactions.

Choice B reason: Asking for common elements seeks patterns, not clarification of specific concerns. Emotional concerns, tied to amygdala hyperactivity, require precise understanding. This question is too vague, risking misinterpretation of neurobiological emotional cues, making it less effective for therapeutic clarification in psychiatric care.

Choice C reason: Requesting a full recount is inefficient and may overwhelm patients with anxiety or cognitive deficits, like those from dopamine dysregulation. Clarification needs targeted questions to confirm specific concerns, not a broad restart, making this approach inappropriate for effective therapeutic communication.

Choice D reason: Asking to repeat experiences may frustrate patients and fail to clarify specific points. Emotional concerns, linked to stress-induced cortisol spikes, need focused verification. This vague request risks missing neurobiological nuances, making it less effective than direct confirmation for therapeutic clarification.