Your patient sometimes forgets to eat. In which part of the nursing care plan would the nurse expect to find this statement: “Offer snacks and finger foods frequently”?
Intervention
Planning/Goals
Assessment
Diagnosis
The Correct Answer is A
Choice A reason: Interventions, like offering snacks, address identified problems (e.g., forgetting to eat) to meet nutritional needs. This action targets physiological deficits, potentially linked to cognitive impairments from low acetylcholine in dementia, ensuring adequate caloric intake to support brain function and overall health in the care plan.
Choice B reason: Planning/goals outline desired outcomes, not specific actions. Forgetting to eat, possibly due to frontal lobe dysfunction, requires goals like “maintain adequate nutrition.” Interventions, not goals, specify actions like offering snacks, making this section incorrect for the statement’s placement in the care plan.
Choice C reason: Assessment involves data collection, like observing eating patterns, not actions like offering snacks. Forgetting to eat may reflect cognitive deficits, but assessment identifies the problem, not solutions. This section precedes interventions, making it an incorrect location for the described statement.
Choice D reason: Diagnosis identifies problems, like “impaired nutrition” due to cognitive deficits, not specific actions. Offering snacks is an intervention to address the diagnosis, not the diagnosis itself. This section is incorrect for the statement, which belongs in the intervention phase of the care plan.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: Nurses must adhere to professional standards, ensuring safe care despite substandard policies. Restraint use, for example, must minimize harm and respect patient dignity, regardless of policy. This aligns with ethical principles and evidence-based practices for managing agitation linked to neurotransmitter imbalances, upholding nurse accountability.
Choice B reason: Leaving the premises after informing a supervisor abandons patients, violating ethical duties. Professional standards require nurses to advocate for safe practices, like appropriate restraint use for dopamine-driven agitation, within the system. This option is impractical and neglects patient care responsibilities, making it incorrect.
Choice C reason: Agency policies do not override professional standards. Nurses are accountable to evidence-based practices, ensuring interventions like restraints for severe agitation are safe and ethical. Policies may guide but cannot excuse deviations from standards addressing neurobiological safety needs, making this option scientifically and ethically incorrect.
Choice D reason: Judicial interpretation varies, but nursing practice is guided by professional standards, not unpredictable legal outcomes. Standards ensure safe, ethical care, like minimizing restraint use for serotonin-related agitation, regardless of policy or judicial variability. This option is irrelevant to guiding daily nursing practice.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: Blocking norepinephrine at alpha-1 receptors inhibits vasoconstriction, reducing vascular tone. This disrupts baroreceptor-mediated blood pressure regulation, causing orthostatic hypotension when standing. The autonomic nervous system fails to compensate for positional changes, leading to dizziness and fainting, a common side effect of alpha-1 blockers like prazosin.
Choice B reason: Increased psychotic symptoms are linked to dopamine dysregulation, not alpha-1 receptor blockade. Norepinephrine blockade affects autonomic functions, not psychosis, which involves mesolimbic dopamine hyperactivity. This side effect is unrelated to alpha-1 receptors, making this option scientifically inaccurate for the described mechanism.
Choice C reason: Appetite disturbance is typically associated with serotonin or histamine receptor effects, not alpha-1 norepinephrine blockade. Norepinephrine at alpha-1 receptors regulates vascular tone, not appetite control, which involves hypothalamic signaling. This side effect is not a direct consequence of alpha-1 blockade, rendering this option incorrect.
Choice D reason: Hypertensive crisis results from excessive norepinephrine activity, often due to monoamine oxidase inhibitors, not alpha-1 receptor blockade. Blocking alpha-1 receptors causes vasodilation, lowering blood pressure, not raising it. This makes hypertensive crisis an unlikely side effect, contrary to the pharmacological mechanism of alpha-1 blockers.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.