Your patient sometimes forgets to eat. In which part of the nursing care plan would the nurse expect to find this statement: “Offer snacks and finger foods frequently”?
Intervention
Planning/Goals
Assessment
Diagnosis
The Correct Answer is A
Choice A reason: Interventions, like offering snacks, address identified problems (e.g., forgetting to eat) to meet nutritional needs. This action targets physiological deficits, potentially linked to cognitive impairments from low acetylcholine in dementia, ensuring adequate caloric intake to support brain function and overall health in the care plan.
Choice B reason: Planning/goals outline desired outcomes, not specific actions. Forgetting to eat, possibly due to frontal lobe dysfunction, requires goals like “maintain adequate nutrition.” Interventions, not goals, specify actions like offering snacks, making this section incorrect for the statement’s placement in the care plan.
Choice C reason: Assessment involves data collection, like observing eating patterns, not actions like offering snacks. Forgetting to eat may reflect cognitive deficits, but assessment identifies the problem, not solutions. This section precedes interventions, making it an incorrect location for the described statement.
Choice D reason: Diagnosis identifies problems, like “impaired nutrition” due to cognitive deficits, not specific actions. Offering snacks is an intervention to address the diagnosis, not the diagnosis itself. This section is incorrect for the statement, which belongs in the intervention phase of the care plan.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
Choice A reason: Silently adding an inappropriate outcome disregards patient safety and autonomy. Outcomes must align with neurobiological needs, like serotonin modulation for depression. This approach fails to engage the patient in decision-making, risking ineffective treatment and neglecting evidence-based collaborative care principles.
Choice B reason: Formulating outcomes without patient input violates autonomy. Collaborative goal-setting, considering neurobiological factors like dopamine imbalances, ensures patient engagement and effective treatment. Excluding the patient disregards their perspective, reducing adherence and therapeutic alliance, making this approach contrary to evidence-based psychiatric nursing.
Choice C reason: Exploring consequences respects autonomy while guiding patients toward safe outcomes. Discussing implications, like medication non-adherence worsening dopamine-driven symptoms, fosters informed decisions. This collaborative approach aligns with cognitive-behavioral principles and neurobiological treatment needs, ensuring effective, patient-centered care in psychiatric practice.
Choice D reason: Educating that an outcome is unrealistic may dismiss patient autonomy. While addressing neurobiological realities, like serotonin deficits, is important, unilateral education risks disengagement. Collaborative exploration of consequences is more effective, promoting informed choices and adherence, making this option less suitable than discussion.
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Choice A reason: Flooding involves intense, immediate exposure to the feared stimulus, like elevators, overwhelming amygdala-driven fear responses. This contrasts with gradual exposure, which calms norepinephrine surges incrementally. Flooding is less controlled and riskier, making it incorrect for the described gradual relaxation technique.
Choice B reason: Systematic desensitization pairs gradual exposure to a fear, like elevators, with relaxation to reduce amygdala hyperactivity and norepinephrine-driven panic. This counterconditions fear responses, promoting calm neural pathways, aligning with the described technique and making it the correct choice for this therapeutic approach.
Choice C reason: Combination therapy involves multiple modalities, like medication and psychotherapy, not specifically gradual exposure with relaxation. The described technique targets phobia-specific amygdala responses, not a broad approach, making combination therapy too vague and incorrect for this targeted intervention.
Choice D reason: Cognitive restructuring modifies thought patterns, not exposure-based fear responses. While it addresses distorted beliefs, the described technique uses relaxation with gradual exposure to reduce norepinephrine-driven panic, not cognitive reframing, making this incorrect for the specific therapeutic method described.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
