Your patient sometimes forgets to eat. In which part of the nursing care plan would the nurse expect to find this statement: “Offer snacks and finger foods frequently”?
Intervention
Planning/Goals
Assessment
Diagnosis
The Correct Answer is A
Choice A reason: Interventions, like offering snacks, address identified problems (e.g., forgetting to eat) to meet nutritional needs. This action targets physiological deficits, potentially linked to cognitive impairments from low acetylcholine in dementia, ensuring adequate caloric intake to support brain function and overall health in the care plan.
Choice B reason: Planning/goals outline desired outcomes, not specific actions. Forgetting to eat, possibly due to frontal lobe dysfunction, requires goals like “maintain adequate nutrition.” Interventions, not goals, specify actions like offering snacks, making this section incorrect for the statement’s placement in the care plan.
Choice C reason: Assessment involves data collection, like observing eating patterns, not actions like offering snacks. Forgetting to eat may reflect cognitive deficits, but assessment identifies the problem, not solutions. This section precedes interventions, making it an incorrect location for the described statement.
Choice D reason: Diagnosis identifies problems, like “impaired nutrition” due to cognitive deficits, not specific actions. Offering snacks is an intervention to address the diagnosis, not the diagnosis itself. This section is incorrect for the statement, which belongs in the intervention phase of the care plan.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Choice A reason: Lack of support systems may warrant outpatient intervention, not hospitalization. Inpatient care targets acute risks, like suicidal ideation from serotonin deficits. Community support addresses social needs, not immediate safety, making this insufficient for justifying hospitalization in mental health care.
Choice B reason: Hospitalization is reserved for clear danger to self or others, like suicidal or aggressive behaviors from dopamine-driven psychosis. Inpatient settings stabilize acute neurobiological crises, ensuring safety and medication adherence, making this the correct criterion for psychiatric hospitalization.
Choice C reason: New symptoms may require evaluation, but hospitalization is prioritized for safety risks. Symptom changes, like increased anxiety, can often be managed outpatient unless dangerous. This criterion is secondary to immediate risk, making it incorrect for hospitalization justification.
Choice D reason: Medication non-compliance may exacerbate symptoms but does not automatically warrant hospitalization. Outpatient interventions can address adherence unless safety risks, like dopamine-driven aggression, arise. This is not the primary criterion for inpatient care, making it incorrect.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: Justice ensures fair treatment across patients. Different interventions (restraint vs. supervision) for self-mutilation, possibly due to serotonin dysregulation, must be equitably applied based on clinical need, not bias. Ensuring consistent, fair application of interventions aligns with justice, addressing ethical concerns about differential treatment in psychiatric care.
Choice B reason: Autonomy involves respecting patient choices, but self-mutilation, driven by impulsivity or emotional dysregulation, requires safety interventions overriding choice. Restraint and supervision prioritize safety over autonomy, making this principle less relevant than justice, which focuses on equitable treatment across patients in this scenario.
Choice C reason: Fidelity emphasizes keeping promises or loyalty to patients, not the fairness of intervention choices. While trust is crucial, the concern here is equitable treatment for self-mutilation, not commitment to promises. Fidelity is secondary to justice in addressing differential interventions, making it incorrect.
Choice D reason: Beneficence focuses on doing good, like preventing harm in self-mutilation. Both restraint and supervision aim to protect, but the ethical concern is fairness, not benefit. Justice addresses equitable application of interventions, making beneficence less directly applicable to the ethical dilemma described.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
