Which of the following speech patterns is an example of tangential thinking?
Involuntary, excessive continuation or repetition of a single response or idea
Has a lack of a logical relationship between thoughts, making the speech vague, diffuse, and unfocused
Overproductive speech which rapidly moves from topic to topic with a tenuous logical link between topics
Provides a lot of unnecessary detail, never returns to the central point, and never answers the question
The Correct Answer is D
Choice A reason: Involuntary repetition, or perseveration, involves repeating a single idea, often due to frontal lobe dysfunction in disorders like schizophrenia. Unlike tangential thinking, it fixates on one thought without divergence, making it distinct and incorrect for describing the diffuse, off-point speech of tangentially.
Choice B reason: Lacking logical relationships describes loose associations, not tangential thinking. Loose associations, seen in schizophrenia, reflect disorganized thoughts due to dopamine dysregulation, jumping illogically between ideas. Tangentiality diverges with excessive detail, staying somewhat related but off-point, making this option incorrect.
Choice C reason: Overproductive speech with tenuous links describes flight of ideas, common in mania with elevated dopamine. Unlike tangentiality, it involves rapid topic shifts with loose connections, not excessive detail missing the point. This distinction makes it an incorrect choice for tangential thinking.
Choice D reason: Tangential thinking involves excessive, irrelevant details, failing to return to the original question, often seen in schizophrenia or mania. This reflects disrupted executive function in the prefrontal cortex, impairing focus. The description matches this pattern, making it the correct choice for tangential speech.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: Justice ensures fair treatment across patients. Different interventions (restraint vs. supervision) for self-mutilation, possibly due to serotonin dysregulation, must be equitably applied based on clinical need, not bias. Ensuring consistent, fair application of interventions aligns with justice, addressing ethical concerns about differential treatment in psychiatric care.
Choice B reason: Autonomy involves respecting patient choices, but self-mutilation, driven by impulsivity or emotional dysregulation, requires safety interventions overriding choice. Restraint and supervision prioritize safety over autonomy, making this principle less relevant than justice, which focuses on equitable treatment across patients in this scenario.
Choice C reason: Fidelity emphasizes keeping promises or loyalty to patients, not the fairness of intervention choices. While trust is crucial, the concern here is equitable treatment for self-mutilation, not commitment to promises. Fidelity is secondary to justice in addressing differential interventions, making it incorrect.
Choice D reason: Beneficence focuses on doing good, like preventing harm in self-mutilation. Both restraint and supervision aim to protect, but the ethical concern is fairness, not benefit. Justice addresses equitable application of interventions, making beneficence less directly applicable to the ethical dilemma described.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: This question verifies the nurse’s interpretation, ensuring accurate understanding of concerns linked to emotional dysregulation, possibly from serotonin imbalances. It promotes therapeutic communication, engaging prefrontal cortex processing to clarify patient emotions, reducing miscommunication and fostering trust in psychiatric interactions.
Choice B reason: Asking for common elements seeks patterns, not clarification of specific concerns. Emotional concerns, tied to amygdala hyperactivity, require precise understanding. This question is too vague, risking misinterpretation of neurobiological emotional cues, making it less effective for therapeutic clarification in psychiatric care.
Choice C reason: Requesting a full recount is inefficient and may overwhelm patients with anxiety or cognitive deficits, like those from dopamine dysregulation. Clarification needs targeted questions to confirm specific concerns, not a broad restart, making this approach inappropriate for effective therapeutic communication.
Choice D reason: Asking to repeat experiences may frustrate patients and fail to clarify specific points. Emotional concerns, linked to stress-induced cortisol spikes, need focused verification. This vague request risks missing neurobiological nuances, making it less effective than direct confirmation for therapeutic clarification.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.