A client is newly prescribed a medication that will block the effects of histamine for the treatment of a mental health disorder. The client asks, “What side effects should I anticipate with this new medication?” Which response by the nurse is accurate?

Choice A reason: Intervening in self-harm prioritizes beneficence, ensuring safety, over autonomy. Self-mutilation, often linked to dysregulated serotonin or impulsivity, requires immediate action to prevent harm, overriding patient choice. Autonomy is secondary when safety is at risk, making this an incorrect application of the principle.

Choice B reason: Exploring medication options respects autonomy by involving patients in decisions, aligning with their values. This considers individual neurobiological responses (e.g., serotonin reuptake variations) and preferences, empowering informed choice. Autonomy emphasizes patient control over treatment, making this the correct approach for ethical psychiatric care.

Choice C reason: Restricting patients for fighting prioritizes safety and unit order, not autonomy. Conflict may stem from emotional dysregulation or neurotransmitter imbalances, but restricting movement limits patient choice. This action reflects beneficence or justice, not autonomy, making it an incorrect choice for this ethical principle.

Choice D reason: Staying with an anxious patient supports emotional regulation, possibly linked to GABA deficits, but emphasizes beneficence over autonomy. While supportive, it does not involve patient decision-making. Autonomy requires empowering patient choice, not just presence, making this an incorrect application of the ethical principle.

Choice A reason: Suppressing anger ignores countertransference, which can impair therapeutic neutrality. Anger may stem from patient behaviors linked to dopamine-driven paranoia, but suppression risks unconscious bias affecting care. Addressing feelings through supervision maintains professionalism, making this response less effective for managing emotions.

Choice B reason: Discussing anger with a manager addresses countertransference, a reaction to patient behaviors like suspicion from dopamine dysregulation. This allows reflection, reducing bias and maintaining therapeutic neutrality. It supports professional care by processing emotions, aligning with evidence-based psychiatric nursing practices for managing countertransference.

Choice C reason: Expressing anger directly risks damaging the therapeutic alliance. Suspicion, tied to mesolimbic dopamine excess, may escalate with confrontation, increasing patient anxiety. This approach disregards professional boundaries and neurobiological sensitivities, making it inappropriate for maintaining effective psychiatric care.

Choice D reason: Reassigning the patient avoids addressing countertransference, neglecting professional growth. Suspicion, linked to neurobiological paranoia, requires consistent care. Reassignment disrupts continuity, potentially worsening patient trust and outcomes, making this an ineffective response compared to processing feelings through supervision.