A client diagnosed with chronic kidney disease is completing an exchange during peritoneal dialysis. The nurse observes that the peritoneal fluid is draining slowly and that the client’s abdomen is increasing in girth. What is the nurse’s most appropriate action?
Advance the catheter 2 to 4 cm further into the peritoneal cavity
Infuse 50 mL of additional dialysate
Aspirate from the catheter using a 60-mL syringe
Reposition the client to facilitate drainage
The Correct Answer is D
Choice A reason: Advancing the catheter further risks perforation or malposition, potentially damaging peritoneal tissues or organs. Slow drainage is often due to positional obstruction or constipation, not catheter depth. This invasive action requires medical orders and imaging confirmation, making it inappropriate as a first step in addressing slow drainage.
Choice B reason: Infusing additional dialysate worsens abdominal distension and does not address slow drainage. It may increase intra-abdominal pressure, causing discomfort or complications like hernia. The issue is outflow obstruction, not insufficient dialysate, so adding more fluid is counterproductive and could exacerbate the client’s condition.
Choice C reason: Aspirating with a syringe is not standard practice and risks introducing infection or damaging the catheter. It does not address underlying causes like positional obstruction or fibrin clots. Medical evaluation or specialized interventions like heparin instillation are needed for persistent drainage issues, making this action inappropriate.
Choice D reason: Repositioning the client facilitates drainage by relieving positional obstructions, such as catheter kinking or omental wrapping, common in peritoneal dialysis. Changing positions (e.g., side-lying or sitting) promotes gravity-assisted flow, reducing abdominal girth and improving exchange efficiency. This non-invasive action is the safest and most effective initial step.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: HIPAA requires client consent to disclose protected health information, like psychological evaluations, to third parties such as employers. This response upholds confidentiality laws, ensuring the client’s privacy is protected while clearly communicating the legal process for information release, making it the most appropriate and compliant action.
Choice B reason: Forwarding the call to the doctor delays the response and does not directly address the confidentiality requirement. While the doctor may handle consent, the nurse can directly inform the employer about the need for signed consent, maintaining clarity and legal compliance in protecting patient privacy.
Choice C reason: Refusing to confirm or deny the client’s presence is overly restrictive and not necessary for an employer’s request. It avoids addressing the consent process, which is the legal requirement for releasing information, making it less direct and potentially confusing in this context.
Choice D reason: Stating that information cannot be given is accurate but incomplete, as it does not explain the consent process. Providing a clear path (obtaining signed consent) ensures compliance with confidentiality laws while addressing the employer’s request, making this response less precise than option a).
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Choice A reason: Legislation changing civil commitment procedures occurred later, notably in the 1960s–1970s, with deinstitutionalization movements. In the 1950s, institutional care was still prevalent, and legislative reforms were not the primary change in mental health treatment, making this option incorrect for that decade.
Choice B reason: Community support services expanded significantly during the 1960s with deinstitutionalization, not the 1950s. While some early community efforts existed, they were not the hallmark change of the 1950s, when institutional care dominated, and psychotropic drugs revolutionized treatment approaches for mental illness.
Choice C reason: The Patient’s Bill of Rights was formalized in the 1970s, not the 1950s. While patient advocacy began to emerge later, the 1950s focused primarily on medical advancements like psychotropic drugs, not legal frameworks for patient rights, making this option incorrect.
Choice D reason: In the 1950s, psychotropic drugs like chlorpromazine were introduced, revolutionizing mental health treatment. These medications effectively managed psychosis, reducing symptoms and enabling outpatient care, decreasing reliance on long-term institutionalization. This marked a significant shift in psychiatric care, making it the key change of the decade.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
