When is a nurse legally obligated to breach confidentiality?
When the client violates the nurse’s boundaries
If threats are made to an identifiable third party
Whenever the client becomes aggressive
At any time a client does not agree with the nurse
The Correct Answer is B
Choice A reason: Violating a nurse’s boundaries, such as inappropriate behavior, does not legally mandate breaching confidentiality. Ethical responses involve setting boundaries or reporting within the care team, but confidentiality is protected unless harm to others is threatened, making this situation insufficient for a legal breach.
Choice B reason: Nurses are legally obligated to breach confidentiality when a client makes credible threats to harm an identifiable third party (Tarasoff duty). This protects potential victims by ensuring warnings or interventions occur, balancing patient confidentiality with public safety, as harm prevention takes precedence in mental health law.
Choice C reason: Client aggression does not automatically warrant breaching confidentiality unless it involves specific threats to identifiable individuals. Aggression is managed within the care setting, and confidentiality is maintained unless legal criteria, like imminent harm to others, are met, making this option incorrect.
Choice D reason: Disagreement with the nurse does not justify breaching confidentiality. Ethical care respects client autonomy, and confidentiality is protected unless legal exceptions, like threats or court orders, apply. Disagreement is managed through therapeutic communication, not by disclosing private information, making this an invalid reason for breach.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Choice A reason: Advancing the catheter further risks perforation or malposition, potentially damaging peritoneal tissues or organs. Slow drainage is often due to positional obstruction or constipation, not catheter depth. This invasive action requires medical orders and imaging confirmation, making it inappropriate as a first step in addressing slow drainage.
Choice B reason: Infusing additional dialysate worsens abdominal distension and does not address slow drainage. It may increase intra-abdominal pressure, causing discomfort or complications like hernia. The issue is outflow obstruction, not insufficient dialysate, so adding more fluid is counterproductive and could exacerbate the client’s condition.
Choice C reason: Aspirating with a syringe is not standard practice and risks introducing infection or damaging the catheter. It does not address underlying causes like positional obstruction or fibrin clots. Medical evaluation or specialized interventions like heparin instillation are needed for persistent drainage issues, making this action inappropriate.
Choice D reason: Repositioning the client facilitates drainage by relieving positional obstructions, such as catheter kinking or omental wrapping, common in peritoneal dialysis. Changing positions (e.g., side-lying or sitting) promotes gravity-assisted flow, reducing abdominal girth and improving exchange efficiency. This non-invasive action is the safest and most effective initial step.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: Silence allows the client to process trauma at their own pace, creating a safe, non-pressurized environment. Fearful clients may need time to feel secure before speaking. This technique fosters trust, encourages emotional expression, and is particularly effective in trauma, where verbalization can be challenging due to psychological distress.
Choice B reason: Giving information provides facts but may overwhelm a fearful client, who may not be ready to process details post-trauma. This technique is less effective for engagement, as it does not address emotional barriers or encourage self-expression, which are critical for therapeutic interaction in trauma recovery.
Choice C reason: Focusing directs the conversation to specific topics, which can feel intrusive for a traumatized client. It assumes readiness to discuss, potentially increasing anxiety or withdrawal. This technique is less effective than silence, which allows the client to initiate dialogue when emotionally prepared, fostering trust.
Choice D reason: Broad opening encourages the client to choose topics but may be too vague for a fearful, traumatized client, who may feel overwhelmed by the lack of structure. Silence is more effective, as it provides space for emotional processing without pressuring the client to verbalize prematurely.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.