An adult client was put in restraints after all other attempts to reduce aggression have failed. Which is required now that restraints have been instituted by the nurse?
A documented nursing assessment every hour
Constant one-on-one supervision during the first hour and then video monitoring
A face-to-face evaluation by the psychiatrist within one hour of restraint
Review of the appropriateness of restraints every hour
The Correct Answer is C
Choice A reason: Hourly nursing assessments are important for monitoring safety in restraints but are not the primary legal requirement. Assessments ensure no physical harm, but psychiatric evaluation within one hour is mandated to confirm restraint necessity, making this option secondary in priority for immediate post-restraint protocol.
Choice B reason: Constant supervision may be used, but transitioning to video monitoring after one hour does not meet strict regulatory standards for restraints. Face-to-face psychiatric evaluation within one hour is required to assess ongoing need and ensure patient rights, making this option less accurate for legal compliance.
Choice C reason: Regulatory standards (e.g., CMS, Joint Commission) mandate a face-to-face evaluation by a psychiatrist within one hour of initiating restraints to assess necessity, safety, and alternatives. This ensures compliance with mental health laws, protects patient rights, and prevents overuse, making it the required action.
Choice D reason: Reviewing restraint appropriateness hourly is part of ongoing care but is not the primary requirement. A psychiatrist’s face-to-face evaluation within one hour takes precedence to ensure legal and ethical use, as it confirms the clinical justification for restraints, making this option secondary.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Choice A reason: The right to do no harm (nonmaleficence) is an ethical principle, not a specific client right. While premature restraints may cause harm, this option does not directly address the legal right violated, which is the use of least restrictive interventions, making it less precise.
Choice B reason: Informed consent involves agreeing to treatments, not the use of restraints, which is a safety intervention. While clients should be informed, premature restraint use violates the right to least restrictive care, not consent, as restraints are not typically consensual interventions.
Choice C reason: Confidential and respectful care relates to privacy and dignity, not the method of intervention. Premature restraints violate the principle of using less invasive options first, not confidentiality or respect, making this right irrelevant to the specific violation described in the scenario.
Choice D reason: The right to least restrictive treatment requires using non-invasive interventions (e.g., de-escalation) before restraints. Premature restraint use violates this right, as mental health laws mandate the least coercive measures to ensure safety, prioritizing patient autonomy and minimizing harm, making this the correct answer.
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Choice A reason: Advancing the catheter further risks perforation or malposition, potentially damaging peritoneal tissues or organs. Slow drainage is often due to positional obstruction or constipation, not catheter depth. This invasive action requires medical orders and imaging confirmation, making it inappropriate as a first step in addressing slow drainage.
Choice B reason: Infusing additional dialysate worsens abdominal distension and does not address slow drainage. It may increase intra-abdominal pressure, causing discomfort or complications like hernia. The issue is outflow obstruction, not insufficient dialysate, so adding more fluid is counterproductive and could exacerbate the client’s condition.
Choice C reason: Aspirating with a syringe is not standard practice and risks introducing infection or damaging the catheter. It does not address underlying causes like positional obstruction or fibrin clots. Medical evaluation or specialized interventions like heparin instillation are needed for persistent drainage issues, making this action inappropriate.
Choice D reason: Repositioning the client facilitates drainage by relieving positional obstructions, such as catheter kinking or omental wrapping, common in peritoneal dialysis. Changing positions (e.g., side-lying or sitting) promotes gravity-assisted flow, reducing abdominal girth and improving exchange efficiency. This non-invasive action is the safest and most effective initial step.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
