A nurse is caring for a patient hospitalized with acute kidney injury (AKI). The healthcare provider has ordered daily weights and strict intake and output monitoring. The nurse notes that the patient has gained 3 pounds over the past 48 hours, with minimal urine output recorded during that time. What does this assessment finding most likely indicate?

Choice A reason: Bluntly stating unavailability dismisses the interrupting patient’s needs without offering a solution, potentially escalating distress. This approach lacks therapeutic communication, as it fails to acknowledge the patient’s urgency or provide a clear plan, which is critical in maintaining trust in a mental health setting.

Choice B reason: Ending the current session prematurely disrespects the silent patient’s therapeutic process. Silence may reflect processing or discomfort, requiring time to build trust. Abruptly shifting focus undermines the current patient’s care, potentially worsening their mental health and disrupting the therapeutic relationship.

Choice C reason: Inviting the interrupting patient to join violates confidentiality and disrupts the current patient’s safe space. Combining sessions without consent breaches ethical principles, potentially causing discomfort or mistrust, which hinders therapeutic progress for both patients in a mental health context.

Choice D reason: Acknowledging the interruption and scheduling a follow-up in 5 minutes respects both patients’ needs. It maintains the current patient’s therapeutic time while addressing the interrupting patient’s urgency, ensuring fairness and trust. This approach upholds ethical care and supports a therapeutic environment for mental health treatment.

Choice A reason: Administering IV normal saline addresses fluid volume deficits, not cloudy dialysate, which suggests peritonitis in CAPD. Saline does not treat infection or clarify drainage. Without addressing the potential infection, complications like sepsis or peritoneal membrane damage may occur, making this intervention irrelevant to the finding.

Choice B reason: Flushing the peritoneal catheter with saline risks introducing bacteria or dislodging clots, worsening potential infection. Cloudy dialysate indicates peritonitis, requiring assessment and likely antibiotics, not flushing. This action could compromise the catheter’s integrity and is not a standard intervention for suspected peritonitis in CAPD.

Choice C reason: Cloudy dialysate is a hallmark of peritonitis in CAPD, caused by bacterial infection. Assessing for fever, abdominal pain, or rebound tenderness confirms infection, enabling prompt antibiotic treatment. Early intervention prevents sepsis or peritoneal membrane scarring, which could necessitate dialysis modality change, making this the priority action.

Choice D reason: Continuing to monitor without assessing for infection delays treatment of potential peritonitis, a serious CAPD complication. Cloudy dialysate requires immediate evaluation, as untreated infection can lead to sepsis, peritoneal damage, or death. Passive monitoring risks patient safety, making this an inadequate response to a critical finding.