The client feels that the client’s rights have been violated. Placing a client in restraints before using other methods of intervention violates which of the client’s rights?
Right to do no harm by the nurse
Right to provide informed consent
Right to receive confidential and respectful care
Right to receive the least restrictive treatment
The Correct Answer is D
Choice A reason: The right to do no harm (nonmaleficence) is an ethical principle, not a specific client right. While premature restraints may cause harm, this option does not directly address the legal right violated, which is the use of least restrictive interventions, making it less precise.
Choice B reason: Informed consent involves agreeing to treatments, not the use of restraints, which is a safety intervention. While clients should be informed, premature restraint use violates the right to least restrictive care, not consent, as restraints are not typically consensual interventions.
Choice C reason: Confidential and respectful care relates to privacy and dignity, not the method of intervention. Premature restraints violate the principle of using less invasive options first, not confidentiality or respect, making this right irrelevant to the specific violation described in the scenario.
Choice D reason: The right to least restrictive treatment requires using non-invasive interventions (e.g., de-escalation) before restraints. Premature restraint use violates this right, as mental health laws mandate the least coercive measures to ensure safety, prioritizing patient autonomy and minimizing harm, making this the correct answer.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: In the oliguric phase of AKI, kidney function is severely impaired, reducing potassium excretion. This leads to hyperkalemia, which disrupts cardiac electrical activity, potentially causing life-threatening arrhythmias or cardiac arrest. Elevated potassium levels are a hallmark of this phase due to decreased glomerular filtration rate and impaired tubular secretion.
Choice B reason: Urine output of 2000 mL in 24 hours indicates polyuria, characteristic of the recovery phase of AKI, not the oliguric phase, where output is typically less than 400 mL/day. High urine output suggests restored renal function, which is not expected in the oliguric phase, where kidneys fail to filter adequately.
Choice C reason: Tachycardia may occur in AKI due to fluid overload causing increased cardiac workload or electrolyte imbalances like hyperkalemia affecting heart rhythm. However, it is a secondary symptom and less specific than hyperkalemia, which directly results from impaired renal excretion and poses a more immediate risk to cardiac function.
Choice D reason: Tenting of the skin indicates dehydration, which may precede AKI but is not typical in the oliguric phase, where fluid retention is more common due to reduced urine output. Fluid overload leads to edema, not dehydration, making skin tenting an unlikely finding in this phase of AKI.
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
Choice A reason: Coercing treatment violates the voluntary client’s autonomy. Legally, voluntary patients can refuse medication unless they pose imminent danger, requiring involuntary commitment. Manipulation or disruption does not meet legal criteria for forced treatment, as mental health laws prioritize patient rights absent clear harm risks.
Choice B reason: A 302 (involuntary commitment) requires evidence of imminent danger to self or others, not just disruptive behavior. Family petitions cannot override this legal threshold without clinical justification, and manipulation alone does not qualify, making this option incorrect for enforcing treatment in a voluntary client.
Choice C reason: As a voluntary client, the individual retains the right to refuse treatment unless deemed a danger to self or others. Mental health laws protect autonomy, and manipulation or lack of progress does not justify forced medication, making refusal a legal right in this scenario.
Choice D reason: Involuntary commitment by a doctor requires evidence of imminent danger or inability to care for oneself, not just disruptive behavior or nonadherence. Without such criteria, the client’s voluntary status protects their right to refuse, making involuntary commitment legally inappropriate in this situation.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.