The client feels that the client’s rights have been violated. Placing a client in restraints before using other methods of intervention violates which of the client’s rights?
Right to do no harm by the nurse
Right to provide informed consent
Right to receive confidential and respectful care
Right to receive the least restrictive treatment
The Correct Answer is D
Choice A reason: The right to do no harm (nonmaleficence) is an ethical principle, not a specific client right. While premature restraints may cause harm, this option does not directly address the legal right violated, which is the use of least restrictive interventions, making it less precise.
Choice B reason: Informed consent involves agreeing to treatments, not the use of restraints, which is a safety intervention. While clients should be informed, premature restraint use violates the right to least restrictive care, not consent, as restraints are not typically consensual interventions.
Choice C reason: Confidential and respectful care relates to privacy and dignity, not the method of intervention. Premature restraints violate the principle of using less invasive options first, not confidentiality or respect, making this right irrelevant to the specific violation described in the scenario.
Choice D reason: The right to least restrictive treatment requires using non-invasive interventions (e.g., de-escalation) before restraints. Premature restraint use violates this right, as mental health laws mandate the least coercive measures to ensure safety, prioritizing patient autonomy and minimizing harm, making this the correct answer.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Choice A reason: Improved nutritional status could cause weight gain but is unlikely in AKI with minimal urine output. AKI patients often have anorexia or dietary restrictions, and weight gain from nutrition would not align with oliguria, which suggests fluid retention rather than increased tissue mass from improved nutrition.
Choice B reason: A 3-pound weight gain in 48 hours with minimal urine output is clinically significant in AKI, indicating fluid retention. Normal weight fluctuations are minimal, and this rapid gain, coupled with oliguria, suggests impaired kidney function, potentially leading to fluid overload complications like hypertension or pulmonary edema.
Choice C reason: Early AKI recovery involves increased urine output (diuresis phase), not minimal output. Weight gain with oliguria indicates ongoing kidney dysfunction, not recovery. Recovery would show improved glomerular filtration and urine production, reducing fluid retention, making this finding inconsistent with AKI recovery.
Choice D reason: In AKI, minimal urine output (oliguria) reflects impaired kidney filtration, leading to fluid retention. A 3-pound weight gain in 48 hours corresponds to approximately 1.5 liters of fluid, indicating fluid overload. This can cause hypertension, pulmonary edema, or heart failure, making fluid retention the most likely explanation.
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
Choice A reason: Restraining and forcibly administering medication violates patient autonomy and ethical principles, potentially escalating agitation in psychosis. It risks physical harm and legal issues, as forced medication requires specific legal orders (e.g., involuntary commitment). Non-invasive approaches like negotiation or assessing refusal reasons are safer and more ethical.
Choice B reason: Stating that refusal prevents improvement is coercive and undermines autonomy. It fails to explore reasons for refusal, such as side effect concerns or psychosis-related mistrust, which are common in severe psychosis. This approach may damage trust and hinder therapeutic alliance, making it inappropriate as an initial action.
Choice C reason: Accepting the client’s refusal respects autonomy while prioritizing safety, critical in psychosis where agitation is common. This allows exploration of refusal reasons (e.g., paranoia) and alternative interventions, maintaining a therapeutic environment. Monitoring ensures no immediate harm, making this the most ethical and safe initial response.
Choice D reason: Obtaining a discharge order for nonadherence is premature and inappropriate, as refusal does not warrant immediate discharge. Psychosis requires ongoing assessment and management, and discharge could exacerbate symptoms or risk harm, making this action contrary to the goal of stabilizing the client’s mental health.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.