The client feels that the client’s rights have been violated. Placing a client in restraints before using other methods of intervention violates which of the client’s rights?
Right to do no harm by the nurse
Right to provide informed consent
Right to receive confidential and respectful care
Right to receive the least restrictive treatment
The Correct Answer is D
Choice A reason: The right to do no harm (nonmaleficence) is an ethical principle, not a specific client right. While premature restraints may cause harm, this option does not directly address the legal right violated, which is the use of least restrictive interventions, making it less precise.
Choice B reason: Informed consent involves agreeing to treatments, not the use of restraints, which is a safety intervention. While clients should be informed, premature restraint use violates the right to least restrictive care, not consent, as restraints are not typically consensual interventions.
Choice C reason: Confidential and respectful care relates to privacy and dignity, not the method of intervention. Premature restraints violate the principle of using less invasive options first, not confidentiality or respect, making this right irrelevant to the specific violation described in the scenario.
Choice D reason: The right to least restrictive treatment requires using non-invasive interventions (e.g., de-escalation) before restraints. Premature restraint use violates this right, as mental health laws mandate the least coercive measures to ensure safety, prioritizing patient autonomy and minimizing harm, making this the correct answer.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Choice A reason: Ignoring sexually aggressive behavior is unsafe and unprofessional, as it fails to address potential escalation or harm. Aggression may stem from impulsivity or mental health conditions, requiring intervention to ensure safety and maintain therapeutic boundaries, making this response inadequate and risky in a behavioral health setting.
Choice B reason: Setting firm limits and boundaries establishes clear expectations, reducing inappropriate behavior while maintaining safety. This approach addresses the client’s impulsivity or lack of control, common in mental health disorders, by reinforcing professional conduct and ensuring a therapeutic environment, making it the most effective and safe response.
Choice C reason: Walking away and delegating care avoids addressing the behavior, potentially escalating the client’s aggression or disrupting care continuity. It fails to establish boundaries, which are critical for managing behavioral issues in mental health settings, and may undermine the client’s trust in the therapeutic process, making it inappropriate.
Choice D reason: Reporting to the director without first addressing the behavior skips essential de-escalation steps. While reporting may be needed for persistent issues, immediate boundary-setting is more appropriate to manage aggression, maintain safety, and support therapeutic goals, making this response less effective as an initial action.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: HIPAA requires client consent to disclose protected health information, like psychological evaluations, to third parties such as employers. This response upholds confidentiality laws, ensuring the client’s privacy is protected while clearly communicating the legal process for information release, making it the most appropriate and compliant action.
Choice B reason: Forwarding the call to the doctor delays the response and does not directly address the confidentiality requirement. While the doctor may handle consent, the nurse can directly inform the employer about the need for signed consent, maintaining clarity and legal compliance in protecting patient privacy.
Choice C reason: Refusing to confirm or deny the client’s presence is overly restrictive and not necessary for an employer’s request. It avoids addressing the consent process, which is the legal requirement for releasing information, making it less direct and potentially confusing in this context.
Choice D reason: Stating that information cannot be given is accurate but incomplete, as it does not explain the consent process. Providing a clear path (obtaining signed consent) ensures compliance with confidentiality laws while addressing the employer’s request, making this response less precise than option a).
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
