A nurse is talking with a patient, and 5 minutes remain in the session. The patient has been silent for most of the session. Another patient comes to the door of the room, interrupts, and says, “I really need to talk to you right now.” The nurse should:

Choice A reason: Releasing the client when behavioral control is achieved aligns with autonomy and beneficence, not nonmaleficence. While it benefits the client, it does not directly address harm prevention, which is the core of nonmaleficence. The focus is on restoring freedom, not specifically ensuring no physical harm during restraint use.

Choice B reason: Explaining release requirements promotes understanding and autonomy but does not directly prevent harm, the focus of nonmaleficence. It supports therapeutic communication but does not address the physical safety risks of restraints, such as skin breakdown or circulation issues, making it less relevant to this principle.

Choice C reason: Applying restraints based on assessment, not attitude, ensures objectivity, aligning with justice and fairness. While this prevents inappropriate restraint use, it is less directly tied to nonmaleficence, which focuses on avoiding harm like injury during restraint application, making it a secondary consideration in this context.

Choice D reason: Assuring restraints do not cause injury directly upholds nonmaleficence, the ethical principle of avoiding harm. Regular checks for skin breakdown, circulation impairment, or nerve damage prevent physical harm, ensuring safety during restraint use, making this action the most aligned with nonmaleficence in a restrained client.

Choice A reason: HIPAA requires client consent to disclose protected health information, like psychological evaluations, to third parties such as employers. This response upholds confidentiality laws, ensuring the client’s privacy is protected while clearly communicating the legal process for information release, making it the most appropriate and compliant action.

Choice B reason: Forwarding the call to the doctor delays the response and does not directly address the confidentiality requirement. While the doctor may handle consent, the nurse can directly inform the employer about the need for signed consent, maintaining clarity and legal compliance in protecting patient privacy.

Choice C reason: Refusing to confirm or deny the client’s presence is overly restrictive and not necessary for an employer’s request. It avoids addressing the consent process, which is the legal requirement for releasing information, making it less direct and potentially confusing in this context.

Choice D reason: Stating that information cannot be given is accurate but incomplete, as it does not explain the consent process. Providing a clear path (obtaining signed consent) ensures compliance with confidentiality laws while addressing the employer’s request, making this response less precise than option a).