A nurse is reviewing an electronic medical record to determine if a client’s rights have been violated by another member of the healthcare team. Which finding will the nurse identify that would indicate a violation of the client’s rights?
The client was placed on one-to-one continuous observation for a history of aggressive behavior
Physical restraints were used to prevent harm to self
The client’s belongings were searched at admission
A lack of documentation of benefits of treatment and treatment options
The Correct Answer is D
Choice A reason: One-to-one observation for aggressive behavior is a standard safety measure to prevent harm, aligning with the right to safe care. It does not violate client rights when justified by clinical need, as it prioritizes protection without restricting autonomy unnecessarily, making it an appropriate intervention.
Choice B reason: Using physical restraints to prevent self-harm is permissible when less restrictive measures fail, aligning with the right to safety. If properly documented and justified, it does not violate rights, as mental health laws allow restraints for imminent danger, making this action compliant with client rights.
Choice C reason: Searching belongings at admission is standard in psychiatric settings to ensure safety (e.g., removing contraband). This practice, when conducted respectfully and per policy, does not violate client rights, as it prioritizes a safe therapeutic environment for all patients and staff on the unit.
Choice D reason: Lack of documentation of treatment benefits and options violates the right to informed consent. Clients must be informed about treatment rationale and alternatives to make autonomous decisions. Failure to document this breaches legal and ethical standards, undermining the client’s ability to participate in their care, making it a rights violation.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
Choice A reason: Allowing a client with suicidal comments to leave against medical advice is unsafe, as it risks self-harm without immediate intervention. Providing resources does not address acute suicide risk, which requires inpatient stabilization to ensure safety, making this action inappropriate in the context of expressed suicidal ideation.
Choice B reason: Contacting family to persuade the client to stay does not address immediate suicide risk. While family support may be helpful, it lacks legal authority to prevent discharge and does not ensure safety, making it less effective than initiating a commitment for a client with suicidal intent.
Choice C reason: A 302 involuntary commitment is appropriate for a client expressing suicidal ideation, indicating imminent danger to self. This legal action ensures safety through inpatient evaluation and treatment, preventing self-harm. Mental health laws prioritize protection in such cases, making this the most appropriate nursing action.
Choice D reason: Calling security to detain the client is coercive and lacks legal basis without a formal commitment process. It may escalate agitation and violate autonomy. A 302 commitment is the proper legal mechanism to ensure safety for a suicidal client, making detention by security inappropriate.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: In ESRD, anuria means no urine output, so excess fluid accumulates in the body, increasing intravascular volume. This can cause hypertension, pulmonary edema, and respiratory distress. Educating the client about these risks emphasizes the importance of fluid restrictions to prevent life-threatening complications between dialysis sessions, addressing their frustration accurately.
Choice B reason: Advising increased fluid intake is incorrect for anuric ESRD patients, as their kidneys cannot excrete fluid. This would exacerbate fluid overload, leading to hypertension, heart failure, or pulmonary edema. Hydration is managed through dialysis, not increased oral intake, which could overwhelm the body’s limited fluid-handling capacity.
Choice C reason: Stating that fluid intake is unrestricted with dialysis is incorrect. Even with regular dialysis, excessive fluid intake between sessions can lead to overload, causing hypertension or pulmonary edema. Dialysis removes a limited amount of fluid per session, requiring strict restrictions to maintain safe fluid balance and prevent complications.
Choice D reason: While potassium and phosphorus restrictions are critical in ESRD to prevent hyperkalemia and hyperphosphatemia, the client’s question focuses on fluid restrictions. This response does not address fluid overload risks like hypertension or pulmonary edema, which are direct consequences of excessive fluid intake in anuric patients, making it irrelevant to the query.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.