A client at 39 weeks gestation is admitted in early labor. During the focused assessment, the practical nurse (PN) reviews the obstetrical history of the client who states that she has been pregnant five times but has only two living children, both of whom were full-term. The other three pregnancies were miscarriages during the first trimester. Which parity should the PN document for the term, premature, abortion, and living children (TPAL) for this client?

The practical nurse (PN) should observe minimal time, maximum distance, and protective shielding when administering direct care to a client who has four gold seed implants on a chest wall tumor.
Minimal time refers to limiting the duration of direct exposure to the client with the gold seed implants. This helps minimize the nurse's exposure to radiation.
Maximum distance refers to maintaining a safe distance from the client with the gold seed implants. The nurse should try to stay as far away as possible while still being able to provide necessary care.
Protective shielding involves using lead aprons, gloves, and other appropriate shielding materials to protect oneself from radiation exposure. These protective measures help reduce the nurse's exposure to radiation during care activities.
B. Rotating assignments with other staff during the shift may not be necessary in this situation unless there are specific staffing requirements or guidelines in place. The primary focus should be on minimizing the nurse's exposure to radiation through time, distance, and shielding.
C. Virtual observation and wearing a film badge for exposure are not applicable in this context. These measures are more relevant for monitoring radiation exposure over time and do not directly address the precautions needed during direct care.
D. Standard precautions with negative pressure isolation are not specifically indicated for a client with gold seed implants. Negative pressure isolation is typically used for clients with infectious diseases that require airborne precautions, and it is not directly related to radiation precautions.

Choice A reason:

Administering the medication and alerting the charge nurse is not necessary in this scenario. The heart rate of 120 beats/minute is within the normal range for a 2-month-old infant, which is typically between 80 to 160 beats per minute. Therefore, there is no immediate concern that would require alerting the charge nurse.

Choice B reason:

Holding the medication and documenting the cardiac assessment would be appropriate if the heart rate were outside the normal range or if there were other signs of digoxin toxicity or adverse effects. Since the heart rate is within the normal range, this action is not warranted.

Choice C reason:

Administering the medication and documenting the heart rate is the correct action. The heart rate of 120 beats/minute falls within the normal range for a 2-month-old infant¹². Digoxin is prescribed to manage certain heart conditions, and as long as the heart rate is within the normal range and there are no signs of toxicity, the medication should be given as prescribed.

Choice D reason:

Holding the medication and rechecking the heart rate in 1 hour would be considered if the heart rate were borderline or if there were concerns about the stability of the infant's condition. Since the heart rate is stable and within the normal range, this action is unnecessary.