Which of the following statements is true about conservators?
Because a conservatorship is the least restrictive alternative, a court hearing is not required
The most legally restricting way individuals and property can be handled are through conservatorships and guardianships.
A conservatorship entails control over property, whereas a guardianship entails control over the person.
Conservators cannot be members of the conservative's (client's) family
The Correct Answer is C
A. Because a conservatorship is the least restrictive alternative, a court hearing is not required.
Explanation: This statement is not accurate. Conservatorships are legal arrangements that involve the appointment of a conservator to manage the financial affairs and assets of an individual who is unable to do so themselves. While conservatorships may be necessary for the protection of the individual, they are not automatically considered the least restrictive alternative, and a court hearing is typically required to establish one.
B. The most legally restricting way individuals and property can be handled are through conservatorships and guardianships.
Explanation: This statement is partially true. Conservatorships and guardianships are legal mechanisms that grant authority to individuals (conservators and guardians, respectively) to manage the affairs of someone who is unable to do so themselves. While they involve legal restrictions, whether they are the most restrictive or not can depend on the specific details of the arrangement and the jurisdiction.
C. A conservatorship entails control over property, whereas a guardianship entails control over the person.
Explanation: This statement is true. In general, a conservatorship focuses on managing the financial affairs and assets of an individual, while a guardianship involves decision-making authority over personal and healthcare matters. The roles and responsibilities of conservators and guardians may vary by jurisdiction, but the distinction between control over property and control over the person is a common principle.
D. Conservators cannot be members of the conservatee's (client's) family.
Explanation: This statement is not universally true. In many cases, family members can be appointed as conservators. The court will typically consider the best interests of the individual in need of protection when appointing a conservator, and a family member may be deemed suitable if they can fulfill the responsibilities of the role. The specific rules regarding who can be a conservator may vary by jurisdiction.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is ["A","B","D"]
Explanation
A. Comprehensive assessment
Explanation: A comprehensive assessment involves a thorough evaluation of various cognitive functions, including memory, attention, language, problem-solving, and executive functions. This allows for a comprehensive understanding of an individual's cognitive abilities.
B. Assessing for atypical presentation of illness
Explanation: Assessing for atypical presentation of illness is relevant in a cognitive assessment because some medical conditions or illnesses can manifest with cognitive symptoms. Recognizing atypical presentations helps in identifying potential underlying causes of cognitive changes.
C. Complete blood count
Explanation: While laboratory tests like a complete blood count (CBC) may be useful in identifying certain medical conditions that could affect cognition, it is not a direct component of a cognitive assessment. Cognitive assessments typically involve clinical interviews, neuropsychological testing, and observation of cognitive functions. Blood tests and other diagnostic tools may be used to complement the cognitive assessment but are not considered components of it.
D. Differentiating delirium, dementia, and depression
Explanation: Distinguishing between delirium, dementia, and depression is crucial in a cognitive assessment. Each condition has distinct characteristics, and accurate differentiation is necessary for appropriate intervention and management.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
A. Ensuring ready access to a toilet or commode.
Explanation: Ensuring ready access to a toilet or commode for the client is a practical measure to address bowel incontinence. This proactive approach allows the client to respond to the urge to defecate promptly, reducing the risk of incontinence episodes.
B. Encouraging the intake of 1 L of water each day.
Explanation: While maintaining adequate hydration is important for overall bowel health, it may not directly address the issue of bowel incontinence.
C. Expecting a rapid and full recovery.
Explanation: The expectation of rapid and full recovery does not constitute a specific intervention for addressing bowel incontinence. The approach to managing bowel incontinence is typically individualized and may involve various strategies depending on the underlying causes.
D. Toileting the client 10 to 15 minutes after meals.
Explanation: Toileting the client after meals is a timing strategy that may help take advantage of the gastrocolic reflex, but it is only one aspect of a comprehensive program for managing bowel incontinence. Other interventions, such as dietary adjustments, exercise, and toileting schedules, may also be considered based on the client's specific needs.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.