Which of the following is a true statement about elimination in older adults?
Defecation less than once each day is not necessarily constipation.
Leaking liquid feces should be treated as diarrhea.
Mineral oil is recommended as a laxative for the older adult
Excessive sleep can be a symptom of constipation
The Correct Answer is A
A. Defecation less than once each day is not necessarily constipation.
Explanation: The frequency of bowel movements varies among individuals, and defecating less than once each day does not necessarily indicate constipation. Normal bowel habits can differ, and what is considered regular for one person may not be the same for another. Constipation is better assessed by considering other factors such as stool consistency, straining during bowel movements, and feelings of incomplete evacuation.
B. Leaking liquid feces should be treated as diarrhea.
Explanation: Leaking liquid feces may be indicative of diarrhea, but it is not the only factor to consider. The cause of diarrhea should be investigated, and treatment will depend on the underlying reason, which may include infections, medications, or other medical conditions.
C. Mineral oil is recommended as a laxative for the older adult.
Explanation: Mineral oil is generally not recommended as a laxative for older adults. It can interfere with the absorption of fat-soluble vitamins and may have adverse effects. There are other safer and more effective laxative options that healthcare providers may recommend.
D. Excessive sleep can be a symptom of constipation.
Explanation: Excessive sleep is not typically considered a symptom of constipation. Constipation is more commonly associated with symptoms such as infrequent bowel movements, difficulty passing stool, and abdominal discomfort. Sleep disturbances may have various causes, but they are not a direct symptom of constipation.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is ["A","B","D"]
Explanation
A. Comprehensive assessment
Explanation: A comprehensive assessment involves a thorough evaluation of various cognitive functions, including memory, attention, language, problem-solving, and executive functions. This allows for a comprehensive understanding of an individual's cognitive abilities.
B. Assessing for atypical presentation of illness
Explanation: Assessing for atypical presentation of illness is relevant in a cognitive assessment because some medical conditions or illnesses can manifest with cognitive symptoms. Recognizing atypical presentations helps in identifying potential underlying causes of cognitive changes.
C. Complete blood count
Explanation: While laboratory tests like a complete blood count (CBC) may be useful in identifying certain medical conditions that could affect cognition, it is not a direct component of a cognitive assessment. Cognitive assessments typically involve clinical interviews, neuropsychological testing, and observation of cognitive functions. Blood tests and other diagnostic tools may be used to complement the cognitive assessment but are not considered components of it.
D. Differentiating delirium, dementia, and depression
Explanation: Distinguishing between delirium, dementia, and depression is crucial in a cognitive assessment. Each condition has distinct characteristics, and accurate differentiation is necessary for appropriate intervention and management.
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
A. Four-length rails.
Explanation: Four-length rails fully enclose the bed and can be considered a more restrictive measure. They may be used when a restraint order is in place, but for an alert patient without such an order, less restrictive alternatives are preferred.
B. One-length rail.
Explanation: Using one-length rails can be a less restrictive alternative when a patient is at high risk for falling. The use of one side rail allows for some protection against falls without fully restraining the patient. This approach helps maintain the patient's mobility and autonomy while still providing a safety measure.
C. Two full-length rails.
Explanation: While using two full-length rails is less restrictive than four-length rails, it is still more restrictive than using only one side rail. The goal is to balance fall prevention with the patient's autonomy.
D. No side rails.
Explanation: Using no side rails may not provide adequate protection for an alert patient at high risk for falling. While avoiding restraints is essential, implementing at least one side rail is a reasonable compromise to enhance safety without fully restricting the patient's movement.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
