The nurse caring for patients admitted for infectious diseases understands what information about emerging global diseases and bioterrorism?

Rationale for Choice A:
Documentation is essential for communication and continuity of care, but it is not the most immediate priority in this situation.
The nurse should document the episode of vomiting, including the time, amount, and characteristics of the vomitus, as well as any associated symptoms or interventions.
However, auscultating lung sounds should be done first to assess for potential aspiration, which is a more urgent concern.
Rationale for Choice B:
Offering dry toast may be appropriate after the nurse has assessed for aspiration and determined that it is safe for the client to resume oral intake.
However, it is not the most important action at this time.
The nurse should first assess the client's respiratory status and address any potential complications.
Rationale for Choice C:
Rest is important for healing and recovery, but it is not the most immediate priority in this situation. The nurse should first assess the client's respiratory status and address any potential complications. Once the client is stable, the nurse can then encourage rest.
Rationale for Choice D:
Auscultating lung sounds is the most important action for the nurse to take after a client vomits.
This is because aspiration of vomitus is a serious complication that can lead to pneumonia, respiratory distress, and even death.
By auscultating lung sounds, the nurse can assess for signs of aspiration, such as crackles, wheezing, or diminished breath sounds.
If aspiration is suspected, the nurse can initiate appropriate interventions, such as suctioning, oxygen therapy, and positioning the client to facilitate drainage of secretions.

Choice A rationale:
Addresses the family's fear directly: By demonstrating how to avoid spreading the disease, the nurse directly addresses the family's primary concern, which is the fear of contracting the infection. This proactive approach provides education and reassurance, empowering the family to make informed decisions about visitation.
Promotes understanding and adherence to precautions: Clear instruction on how to don and doff personal protective equipment, hand hygiene techniques, and other infection control measures increases the likelihood that the family will follow the precautions correctly, reducing the risk of transmission.
Empowers the family to make informed choices: By providing knowledge and skills, the nurse enables the family to feel more confident in their ability to visit safely. This sense of control can help to alleviate anxiety and promote positive coping mechanisms.
Facilitates open communication and trust: The demonstration creates an opportunity for the nurse to answer questions, address concerns, and build rapport with the family. This open dialogue can foster trust and collaboration, which are essential for effective care.
Choice B rationale:
May provide false reassurance: While it's important to offer support and hope, it's not always possible to guarantee that family members will not contract the infection. Absolute reassurances could potentially lead to complacency or disregard for precautions, increasing the risk of transmission.
Fails to address the need for education: Simply stating that the family won't get sick doesn't provide them with the knowledge and skills needed to protect themselves and the client. This lack of understanding could result in accidental transmission.
Choice C rationale:
May pressure the family: Encouraging visitation without addressing underlying fears and concerns could be perceived as pressure, leading to resentment, anxiety, or even avoidance. It's important to respect the family's decision-making process and provide support regardless of their choice.
Doesn't prioritize safety: While emotional support is important, the primary focus should be on ensuring the safety of both the client and the family. Encouraging visitation without proper education and precautions could compromise safety.
Choice D rationale:
Focuses on compliance rather than understanding: Informing the family about legal mandates may come across as authoritarian and could potentially increase anxiety or resistance. It's more effective to focus on the rationale behind the precautions and emphasize their role in protecting both the client and the family.

Misses an opportunity to build trust: Simply stating the rules without engaging in dialogue may hinder open communication and trust-building. Taking a collaborative approach and addressing concerns can lead to better understanding and adherence to precautions.