A nurse is providing care for a patient suffering from severe diarrhea. Which acid-base disorder is the patient at risk of developing?

Rationale for Choice A:
Documenting and continuing to monitor is a crucial aspect of nursing care; however, in this scenario, it would not be the first action to take. The significant drop in blood pressure warrants immediate intervention to prevent potential complications.
While monitoring is essential, it does not actively address the underlying cause of the hypotension. Relying solely on monitoring could delay necessary interventions and potentially compromise patient safety.
It's important to balance monitoring with timely interventions to ensure optimal patient outcomes. In this case, calling for assistance takes priority over documentation and continued monitoring.
Rationale for Choice B:
Repeating the blood pressure in 15 minutes could delay critical interventions if the hypotension is severe. Timely action is crucial to maintain adequate tissue perfusion and prevent organ damage.
Waiting to recheck the blood pressure could potentially worsen the patient's condition and lead to adverse outcomes. It's essential to act promptly when a significant change in vital signs occurs.
Rationale for Choice D:
While notifying the primary healthcare provider is an important step, it may not be the most immediate action in this situation. The Rapid Response Team is specifically trained to handle acute patient deterioration and can provide timely interventions.
The Rapid Response Team can initiate life-saving measures, such as administering fluids or medications, while the primary healthcare provider is being notified. This ensures that the patient receives prompt and appropriate care.
Rationale for Choice C:
Calling the Rapid Response Team is the most appropriate first action in this scenario because it ensures a rapid and coordinated response to the patient's hypotension.
The Rapid Response Team can quickly assess the patient, initiate interventions, and potentially prevent further complications. They can also facilitate communication and collaboration among healthcare providers.
Early activation of the Rapid Response Team has been shown to improve patient outcomes in various clinical settings, including postoperative care.

Choice A rationale:
Administering an antipyretic would lower the client's fever, but it would not address the underlying cause of the sepsis. Antipyretics can mask important signs and symptoms of infection, making it more difficult to diagnose and treat the sepsis. It's important to identify the causative organism of sepsis to initiate appropriate antibiotic therapy.
Therefore, obtaining cultures to identify the causative organism is the priority action.
Choice B rationale:
Obtaining specified cultures is the most important action for a client with possible sepsis because it allows for the identification of the causative organism.
This information is essential for selecting the appropriate antibiotic therapy. Cultures should be obtained as soon as possible, before antibiotics are administered.
Choice C rationale:
While administering antibiotics is an important part of the treatment for sepsis, it is not the first action that the nurse should take.
Antibiotics should be administered after the causative organism has been identified.
Administering antibiotics before cultures are obtained can make it more difficult to identify the causative organism.
Choice D rationale:
Placing the client in isolation is important to prevent the spread of infection, but it is not the first action that the nurse should take.
The priority is to identify the causative organism and initiate appropriate treatment. The client can be placed in isolation after cultures have been obtained.