A client has just been informed of a positive HIV test. The client is distraught and does not know what to do. What is the best intervention by the nurse?

Choice A rationale:
Leukocyte-poor packed red blood cells (LP-PRBCs) have a significantly reduced number of white blood cells (WBCs), also known as leukocytes. This is crucial for pre-transplant patients like the one in the question for several reasons:
Prevention of Alloimmunization: WBCs in blood transfusions carry human leukocyte antigens (HLAs), which are proteins on the surface of cells that play a role in the immune system. Exposure to foreign HLAs can cause the recipient's immune system to develop antibodies against them, a process called alloimmunization. These antibodies can then attack and damage the transplanted kidney, leading to rejection. By reducing the number of WBCs in the transfusion, LP-PRBCs significantly lower the risk of alloimmunization.
Reduced Incidence of Febrile Non-Hemolytic Transfusion Reactions (FNHTRs): FNHTRs are the most common type of transfusion reaction, characterized by fever, chills, and occasionally other symptoms like nausea and vomiting. They are thought to be caused by cytokines released from WBCs in the transfused blood. LP-PRBCs, with their reduced WBC content, have been shown to lower the incidence of FNHTRs.
Potential Benefits for Graft Survival: Some studies have suggested that the use of LP-PRBCs for transfusions may improve long-term graft survival rates in kidney transplant patients, although more research is needed to confirm these findings.
Choice B rationale:
This statement is incorrect. While LP-PRBCs may have some advantages in terms of absorption or utilization, this is not the primary reason for their use in pre-transplant patients. The main goal is to reduce the risk of alloimmunization and other transfusion-related complications.
Choice C rationale:
This statement is partially correct. LP-PRBCs do tend to cause fewer blood reactions, particularly FNHTRs, as explained in the rationale for Choice A. However, this is not the most comprehensive or accurate explanation for their use in pre-transplant patients.
Choice D rationale:
This statement is not directly relevant to the use of LP-PRBCs in pre-transplant patients. While LP-PRBCs may have a lower risk of hemolysis, this is not the primary reason for their use in this specific context.

Choice A rationale:
Addresses the family's fear directly: By demonstrating how to avoid spreading the disease, the nurse directly addresses the family's primary concern, which is the fear of contracting the infection. This proactive approach provides education and reassurance, empowering the family to make informed decisions about visitation.
Promotes understanding and adherence to precautions: Clear instruction on how to don and doff personal protective equipment, hand hygiene techniques, and other infection control measures increases the likelihood that the family will follow the precautions correctly, reducing the risk of transmission.
Empowers the family to make informed choices: By providing knowledge and skills, the nurse enables the family to feel more confident in their ability to visit safely. This sense of control can help to alleviate anxiety and promote positive coping mechanisms.
Facilitates open communication and trust: The demonstration creates an opportunity for the nurse to answer questions, address concerns, and build rapport with the family. This open dialogue can foster trust and collaboration, which are essential for effective care.
Choice B rationale:
May provide false reassurance: While it's important to offer support and hope, it's not always possible to guarantee that family members will not contract the infection. Absolute reassurances could potentially lead to complacency or disregard for precautions, increasing the risk of transmission.
Fails to address the need for education: Simply stating that the family won't get sick doesn't provide them with the knowledge and skills needed to protect themselves and the client. This lack of understanding could result in accidental transmission.
Choice C rationale:
May pressure the family: Encouraging visitation without addressing underlying fears and concerns could be perceived as pressure, leading to resentment, anxiety, or even avoidance. It's important to respect the family's decision-making process and provide support regardless of their choice.
Doesn't prioritize safety: While emotional support is important, the primary focus should be on ensuring the safety of both the client and the family. Encouraging visitation without proper education and precautions could compromise safety.
Choice D rationale:
Focuses on compliance rather than understanding: Informing the family about legal mandates may come across as authoritarian and could potentially increase anxiety or resistance. It's more effective to focus on the rationale behind the precautions and emphasize their role in protecting both the client and the family.

Misses an opportunity to build trust: Simply stating the rules without engaging in dialogue may hinder open communication and trust-building. Taking a collaborative approach and addressing concerns can lead to better understanding and adherence to precautions.