Rationale for Choice A:
Documenting and continuing to monitor is a crucial aspect of nursing care; however, in this scenario, it would not be the first action to take. The significant drop in blood pressure warrants immediate intervention to prevent potential complications.
While monitoring is essential, it does not actively address the underlying cause of the hypotension. Relying solely on monitoring could delay necessary interventions and potentially compromise patient safety.
It's important to balance monitoring with timely interventions to ensure optimal patient outcomes. In this case, calling for assistance takes priority over documentation and continued monitoring.
Rationale for Choice B:
Repeating the blood pressure in 15 minutes could delay critical interventions if the hypotension is severe. Timely action is crucial to maintain adequate tissue perfusion and prevent organ damage.
Waiting to recheck the blood pressure could potentially worsen the patient's condition and lead to adverse outcomes. It's essential to act promptly when a significant change in vital signs occurs.
Rationale for Choice D:
While notifying the primary healthcare provider is an important step, it may not be the most immediate action in this situation. The Rapid Response Team is specifically trained to handle acute patient deterioration and can provide timely interventions.
The Rapid Response Team can initiate life-saving measures, such as administering fluids or medications, while the primary healthcare provider is being notified. This ensures that the patient receives prompt and appropriate care.
Rationale for Choice C:
Calling the Rapid Response Team is the most appropriate first action in this scenario because it ensures a rapid and coordinated response to the patient's hypotension.
The Rapid Response Team can quickly assess the patient, initiate interventions, and potentially prevent further complications. They can also facilitate communication and collaboration among healthcare providers.
Early activation of the Rapid Response Team has been shown to improve patient outcomes in various clinical settings, including postoperative care.

Choice A rationale:
Wearing a respirator when handling urine output is not routinely recommended for MRSA infections. While airborne transmission of MRSA is possible, it is primarily spread through direct contact with infected skin or surfaces. Respirators are typically reserved for situations where there is a high risk of aerosolization, such as during certain medical procedures.
The use of a respirator can be cumbersome and uncomfortable, and it may not provide significant additional protection in this context.

It's important to prioritize hand hygiene and contact precautions over respirator use for routine care of patients with MRSA infections.
Choice B rationale:
Limiting visitors strictly to immediate family members only is not necessary for MRSA infection control. Visitors can be educated on proper hand hygiene and contact precautions to minimize the risk of transmission.
Restricting visitors can have negative psychosocial impacts on the patient, such as isolation and decreased social support. It's important to balance infection control measures with the patient's overall well-being.
Choice C rationale:
Washing hands only after removing gloves post-care is inadequate for MRSA infection control. Hands should be washed thoroughly with soap and water or an alcohol-based hand sanitizer:
Before and after entering the patient's room
Before and after any contact with the patient or their surroundings After removing gloves
After using the toilet Before eating or drinking.

Choice D rationale:
Vancomycin is an antibiotic that is effective against MRSA infections. It is often the first-line treatment for these infections.
Preparing to administer vancomycin as prescribed by the healthcare provider is the most appropriate action to take to address the patient's MRSA infection.
Prompt initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy is essential to controlling the infection and preventing complications.