A patient is scheduled to receive 250 ml of Normal Saline over a 90-minute time period. The drop factor is 10 gtts/ml. What is the correct calculation?

Rationale for Choice A:
Documenting and continuing to monitor is a crucial aspect of nursing care; however, in this scenario, it would not be the first action to take. The significant drop in blood pressure warrants immediate intervention to prevent potential complications.
While monitoring is essential, it does not actively address the underlying cause of the hypotension. Relying solely on monitoring could delay necessary interventions and potentially compromise patient safety.
It's important to balance monitoring with timely interventions to ensure optimal patient outcomes. In this case, calling for assistance takes priority over documentation and continued monitoring.
Rationale for Choice B:
Repeating the blood pressure in 15 minutes could delay critical interventions if the hypotension is severe. Timely action is crucial to maintain adequate tissue perfusion and prevent organ damage.
Waiting to recheck the blood pressure could potentially worsen the patient's condition and lead to adverse outcomes. It's essential to act promptly when a significant change in vital signs occurs.
Rationale for Choice D:
While notifying the primary healthcare provider is an important step, it may not be the most immediate action in this situation. The Rapid Response Team is specifically trained to handle acute patient deterioration and can provide timely interventions.
The Rapid Response Team can initiate life-saving measures, such as administering fluids or medications, while the primary healthcare provider is being notified. This ensures that the patient receives prompt and appropriate care.
Rationale for Choice C:
Calling the Rapid Response Team is the most appropriate first action in this scenario because it ensures a rapid and coordinated response to the patient's hypotension.
The Rapid Response Team can quickly assess the patient, initiate interventions, and potentially prevent further complications. They can also facilitate communication and collaboration among healthcare providers.
Early activation of the Rapid Response Team has been shown to improve patient outcomes in various clinical settings, including postoperative care.

Choice A rationale:
While it's true that dehydration can lead to incontinence, simply stating this fact to the patient doesn't directly address the issue of dehydration. It doesn't provide actionable steps to correct the dehydration.
Incontinence can be a result of dehydration, but addressing the dehydration is the primary concern to prevent further complications.
Providing information about incontinence might be helpful in other contexts, but it's not the most effective advice to address mild dehydration in this specific scenario.
Choice B rationale:
Diuretics promote fluid loss through urination, which can worsen dehydration.
Advising the patient to take a diuretic in the morning would be counterproductive in this case. The goal is to increase fluid intake, not further deplete fluid levels.
It's important to consider the patient's medications and potential interactions before suggesting any changes to their medication regimen.

Choice C rationale:
Regular fluid intake is essential for maintaining hydration and replenishing lost fluids.
This advice directly addresses the issue of dehydration by encouraging the patient to consume fluids consistently. Drinking fluids every 1 to 2 hours can help restore fluid balance and prevent further complications.
It's a simple, actionable, and effective measure to address mild dehydration.
Choice D rationale:
While reducing sodium intake can be beneficial for some individuals with hypertension or other conditions, it's not the most relevant advice for addressing mild dehydration.
Sodium restriction might be appropriate in certain cases, but it doesn't directly address the immediate need to increase fluid intake.
The primary focus in this situation should be on replenishing fluids, not restricting sodium.