The nurse is caring for a client with an ileostomy because of inflammatory bowel disease. Which assessment findings indicate to the nurse that the ileostomy is functioning as expected? Select all that apply.

Choice A Reason:

Documenting that the nasogastric tube is in the correct place is not appropriate in this scenario. The normal pH range for gastric contents is typically between 1.5 and 3.5. A pH of 7.35 is much higher than this range, indicating that the tube may not be in the stomach. Therefore, documenting the tube as correctly placed could lead to potential complications, such as improper feeding or medication administration.

Choice B Reason:

Notifying the health care provider is the correct action. A pH of 7.35 suggests that the nasogastric tube may be misplaced, possibly in the respiratory tract or another non-gastric location. Immediate notification of the health care provider is crucial to prevent any adverse outcomes and to take corrective measures, such as confirming placement with an X-ray or re-inserting the tube.

Choice C Reason:

Checking for placement by auscultating for air injected into the tube is not a reliable method for verifying nasogastric tube placement. While this method was traditionally used, it has been found to be inaccurate and is no longer recommended. The sound of air entering the stomach can be misleading and does not confirm correct placement.

Choice D Reason:

Retesting the pH using another strip is not the best immediate action. While it is important to ensure the accuracy of the pH reading, a pH of 7.35 is significantly outside the normal gastric range, and retesting is unlikely to yield a different result. The priority should be to notify the health care provider to address the potential misplacement of the tube.

Choice A Reason:

Activating the hospital’s emergency or rapid response system is the most appropriate first action in this scenario. The client is exhibiting signs of a potentially life-threatening condition, such as airway obstruction or severe swelling that could compromise breathing. Immediate intervention by a rapid response team can provide the necessary advanced airway management and other critical care measures to stabilize the patient. This action prioritizes the client’s airway, breathing, and circulation, which are the fundamental aspects of emergency care.

Choice B Reason:

Placing a heart monitor on the client and observing for dysrhythmias is important but not the immediate priority in this situation. While monitoring the heart is crucial, the client’s airway and breathing issues take precedence. Addressing the airway obstruction and ensuring adequate breathing should be the first step before focusing on cardiac monitoring.

Choice C Reason:

Asking the charge nurse to come see the client immediately is a reasonable action, but it may delay the necessary urgent intervention. The charge nurse may not have the advanced skills or equipment required to manage a severe airway obstruction. Activating the rapid response system ensures that a team of healthcare professionals with the appropriate expertise and equipment can respond quickly.

Choice D Reason:

Checking the client’s blood pressure and heart rate is a standard nursing assessment, but it is not the immediate priority in this emergency situation. The client’s difficulty breathing and stridor indicate a potential airway obstruction, which requires immediate attention. Ensuring the airway is clear and the client can breathe is more critical than checking vital signs at this moment.

Choice E Reason:

Providing a calm and assuring environment for the client is important for reducing anxiety and stress, but it does not address the immediate life-threatening issue. While maintaining a calm environment is beneficial, the nurse must first ensure that the client’s airway is secure and that they can breathe adequately. This can only be achieved by activating the rapid response system.