A nurse suspects a client has diabetes insipidus. What are the priority interventions? Select all that apply.

Choice A: Observe for clear drainage.

Reason: Observing for clear drainage is important as it can indicate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, especially after nasal or sinus surgery. CSF leakage is a serious complication that requires immediate medical attention. Clear drainage from the nose should be tested for the presence of glucose, which can confirm if it is CSF.

Choice B: Assess for signs of bleeding.

Reason: Assessing for signs of bleeding is crucial in the immediate postoperative period. Nasal packing can sometimes mask ongoing bleeding, so it is important to monitor for any signs of excessive blood loss. This includes checking for blood-soaked dressings, frequent swallowing (which can indicate blood trickling down the throat), and changes in vital signs such as increased heart rate and decreased blood pressure.

Choice C: Watch the client for frequent swallowing.

Reason: Watching the client for frequent swallowing is important because it can be a sign of posterior nasal bleeding. Blood can trickle down the back of the throat, causing the client to swallow frequently. This is a subtle but significant sign that should prompt further investigation and possible intervention.

Choice D: Change the nasal packing.

Reason: This choice is incorrect. Nasal packing should not be changed by the nurse without specific orders from the physician. Changing the packing prematurely can disrupt the surgical site, cause bleeding, and increase the risk of infection. The packing is usually removed by the surgeon or under their direct supervision.

Choice E: Administer a nasal steroid to decrease edema.

Reason: Administering a nasal steroid can help reduce inflammation and edema in the nasal passages. However, this should only be done if prescribed by the physician. Nasal steroids can help improve breathing and reduce discomfort, but they must be used according to medical guidance to avoid potential side effects.

Choice A Reason:

Gaining weight can be an indicator of improved nutrition, but it does not directly address the client’s ability to swallow safely and effectively. Weight gain could be due to other factors such as fluid retention or changes in metabolism. Therefore, while it is a positive outcome, it is not the best indicator of improved swallowing function.

Choice B Reason:

Choosing preferred items from the menu indicates that the client is engaged in their meal planning and has an appetite. However, it does not directly measure the client’s ability to swallow safely. The client might still have difficulty swallowing even if they are choosing their preferred foods.

Choice C Reason:

Clear understanding and articulation are important for communication and can indicate cognitive improvement. However, this choice does not directly relate to the client’s swallowing ability. The primary concern in this scenario is the client’s ability to swallow safely, not their communication skills.

Choice D Reason:

Eating 75 to 100% of all meals and snacks is the best indicator that the client has improved their swallowing ability. This choice directly measures the client’s ability to consume food and liquids safely and effectively. It shows that the client can manage their meals without significant difficulty, which is the primary goal of the intervention.