A nurse is collecting research to revise the protocol for specimen collection on their unit.
From which of the following sources should the nurse retrieve the information?
Material safety data sheets.
Client medical records.
Facility policy and procedures.
Evidence-based practice.
The Correct Answer is C
Choice A rationale:
Material safety data sheets (MSDS) primarily contain information related to hazardous chemicals and substances used in healthcare settings. While MSDS can be valuable for safety purposes, they do not provide comprehensive information on specimen collection protocols. Therefore, MSDS is not the most appropriate source for revising the specimen collection protocol.
Choice B rationale:
Client medical records are essential for individual patient care and documentation. However, they do not contain the information needed to revise the protocol for specimen collection on the unit. Medical records are specific to individual patient histories, diagnoses, and treatments, and do not address broader unit-wide protocols.
Choice C rationale:
Facility policy and procedures are the most appropriate source for retrieving information to revise the protocol for specimen collection on the unit. These policies and procedures are specifically designed to guide healthcare providers in delivering safe and effective care within the facility. They encompass standardized protocols for various clinical procedures, including specimen collection, making them the ideal source for the nurse's research.
Choice D rationale:
Evidence-based practice (EBP) involves using the best available research evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values to guide healthcare decisions. While EBP is crucial in healthcare, it is not the primary source for revising unit-specific protocols. EBP provides a broader framework for making clinical decisions but may not cover the specific policies and procedures unique to the facility.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A rationale:
Systematic reviews are considered Level I evidence in the hierarchy of evidence in evidence-based practice (EBP). Systematic reviews involve the rigorous and comprehensive synthesis of multiple research studies on a specific topic. This approach minimizes bias and provides the highest level of evidence for making clinical decisions. Systematic reviews typically follow a structured methodology and offer a critical analysis of the existing literature, making them a strong foundation for EBP.
Choice B rationale:
Credible websites are not considered Level I evidence. While some websites may contain reliable information, they vary in quality, and the credibility of the source must be carefully assessed. Relying solely on websites is not the most robust approach in EBP, as it lacks the rigorous systematic review and critical appraisal process of Level I evidence.
Choice C rationale:
Expert opinions are not considered Level I evidence. While expert opinions can be valuable, they are often based on individual experiences and interpretations rather than systematic research. Expert opinions are generally considered lower in the hierarchy of evidence compared to systematic reviews and other forms of research evidence.
Choice D rationale:
Qualitative studies are not considered Level I evidence. Qualitative studies provide valuable insights into the experiences, perceptions, and meanings associated with a particular phenomenon. However, they are typically ranked lower in the hierarchy of evidence compared to systematic reviews and quantitative research studies. Qualitative studies are more appropriate for addressing research questions related to subjective experiences and understanding the "why" and "how" of a phenomenon.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
The correct answer is: A
Choice A reason: Providing the nurse administering medications with an identifying vest can help reduce medication errors by making it easier for other staff and patients to identify the nurse responsible for medication administration. This can minimize interruptions and distractions, which are common causes of medication errors. It also serves as a visual reminder to the nurse of their critical role in medication safety.
Choice B reason: Removing medications from automatic dispensing systems before they are reviewed by pharmacists is not a recommended practice. Pharmacists play a crucial role in reviewing prescriptions for accuracy and potential drug interactions before dispensing. Therefore, medications should remain in the dispensing system until they have been properly reviewed and approved by a pharmacist.
Choice C reason: Waiting to document medications given to clients until the end of a shift is not advisable. Accurate and timely documentation is essential in healthcare, particularly when it comes to medication administration. Documentation should occur as soon as the medication is given to ensure that all healthcare providers have up-to-date information and to prevent errors such as omissions or duplications.
Choice D reason: Preparing medications for multiple clients at the same time increases the risk of errors, such as mix-ups between patients or incorrect dosing. It is best practice to prepare and administer medications for one client at a time, following the ‘five rights’ of medication administration: the right patient, the right drug, the right dose, the right route, and the right time.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.