A nurse is caring for a client who repeatedly refuses meals.
The nurse overhears an assistive personnel (AP) telling the client, "If you don't eat, I'll put restraints on your wrists and feed you." The nurse should intervene and explain to the AP that this statement constitutes which of the following torts?

Choice A rationale:

Amputation, although a significant medical history, is not a contraindication to becoming a living kidney donor. The presence of an amputation does not directly impact the person's ability to donate a kidney to their parent.

Choice B rationale:

Primary glaucoma, a condition affecting the eyes, is also not a contraindication to kidney donation. While eye conditions can affect overall health, they do not specifically prevent an individual from donating a kidney if they are otherwise healthy.

Choice C rationale:

Hypertension (high blood pressure) is a contraindication to kidney donation. Individuals with hypertension are at a higher risk of developing kidney disease themselves. Additionally, donating a kidney could exacerbate their condition, potentially leading to further complications. Therefore, this is the correct choice.

Choice D rationale:

Osteoarthritis, a condition affecting the joints, is not a contraindication to kidney donation. Joint problems do not directly impact kidney function or the ability to donate a kidney.

Choice A rationale:

Sitting in high-Fowler's position during the feeding is actually a preventive measure against aspiration. High-Fowler's position, which involves sitting the patient upright at a 90-degree angle, reduces the risk of aspiration by promoting proper digestion and preventing the regurgitation of gastric contents into the lungs.

Choice B rationale:

A history of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) puts the client at risk for aspiration. GERD is a chronic condition in which stomach acid frequently flows back into the esophagus, potentially reaching the throat and lungs, increasing the risk of aspiration during enteral feedings. Aspiration pneumonia, a serious complication, can develop if stomach contents enter the lungs.

Choice C rationale:

A residual of 65 mL 1 hr postprandial indicates that a significant amount of the feeding solution has not been absorbed, raising concerns about delayed gastric emptying. While this situation might require monitoring and adjustments to the feeding regimen, it does not directly increase the risk of aspiration. Aspiration risk is more related to the reflux of stomach contents into the airways.

Choice D rationale:

Receiving a high-osmolarity formula alone does not directly increase the risk of aspiration. High-osmolarity formulas might require careful administration and monitoring to prevent complications, but aspiration risk is more closely associated with the client's underlying conditions, such as GERD.