A nurse is caring for a client who repeatedly refuses meals.
The nurse overhears an assistive personnel (AP) telling the client, "If you don't eat, I'll put restraints on your wrists and feed you." The nurse should intervene and explain to the AP that this statement constitutes which of the following torts?

Choice A rationale:

An angiocatheter is not appropriate for accessing an implanted venous access port. Angiocatheters are large-bore catheters designed for rapid fluid administration and are typically used for peripheral venous access. They are not suitable for accessing the small, specialized ports used for central venous access.

Choice B rationale:

A 25-gauge needle is too small for accessing an implanted venous access port. While smaller gauge needles are suitable for delicate procedures and patients with fragile veins, they might not provide adequate flow for certain therapies or blood draws. Accessing a port with a needle that is too small can lead to increased pressure, potentially damaging the port or causing discomfort to the patient.

Choice C rationale:

A butterfly needle is also not the best choice for accessing an implanted venous access port. Butterfly needles, also known as winged infusion sets, are commonly used for short-term peripheral venous access. They are not designed for accessing implanted ports, which require a noncoring needle for precise and safe access without damaging the port membrane.

Choice D rationale:

(Correct Choice) A noncoring needle, also known as a Huber needle, is the correct choice for accessing an implanted venous access port. Noncoring needles have a specially designed tip that creates a smaller puncture hole, reducing damage to the port membrane and minimizing patient discomfort. They are specifically designed for accessing ports and are the standard choice for this procedure.

Choice A rationale:

Including any adverse effects of the medications the client might develop is important but does not cover the entire scope of medication reconciliation. It is essential to compare new prescriptions with the list of current medications to prevent drug interactions, duplications, or omissions.

Choice B rationale:

Comparing new prescriptions with the list of medications the client reports is the correct approach to medication reconciliation. This helps identify discrepancies, ensuring that the client's current medications are accurately documented and preventing medication errors.

Choice C rationale:

Excluding nutritional supplements from the list of medications the client reports is incorrect. Nutritional supplements, herbal remedies, and over-the-counter medications are essential components of the medication list. These items can interact with prescribed medications and affect the client's overall health.

Choice D rationale:

Encouraging the client to make his own list after he returns home is not recommended. Patients might not have complete knowledge of the medications they are taking, including dosages and frequencies. Relying solely on the patient-generated list can lead to inaccuracies and potential harm.