A nurse is caring for a client who has physical restraints applied. The nurse determines that the restraints should be removed when which of the following occurs?
The client states that he will harm himself unless the restraints are removed.
The client demonstrates that he is oriented to person, place, and time.
The client is able to follow commands.
The client refuses to take his medication unless he is released.
The Correct Answer is B
A. The client states that he will harm himself unless the restraints are removed.
This statement indicates a clear risk, but merely stating a desire for restraint removal is not sufficient reason to remove restraints. It's essential to assess the patient comprehensively and make the decision based on their current state and safety concerns.
B. The client demonstrates that he is oriented to person, place, and time.
When a restrained patient shows orientation to person (knows who they are and who others are), place (knows where they are), and time (knows the current date and time), it suggests they are aware of their surroundings and can make rational decisions. This orientation indicates a level of awareness that might justify removing the restraints.
C. The client is able to follow commands.
While following commands is an important aspect, it alone might not be enough to guarantee the patient's overall awareness of their situation and safety. A comprehensive assessment, including orientation and ability to follow commands, is necessary.
D. The client refuses to take his medication unless he is released.
Medication refusal alone may not be a sufficient reason to remove restraints, especially if the patient is not demonstrating an understanding of their situation or if releasing the restraints could pose a risk to the patient or others.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
A. Clients who are involuntarily committed do not maintain access to legal counsel.
This statement is incorrect. Clients who are involuntarily committed generally do have the right to legal counsel. They can challenge their commitment in a court of law, and legal representation is often provided to them if they cannot afford it.
B. Clients must be informed of the risks of treatment.
This statement is correct. Informed consent is a fundamental principle in healthcare, including mental health treatment. Clients have the right to be fully informed about the risks and benefits of any treatment or procedure before giving consent.
C. Clients who have a severe mental illness cannot request a psychiatric advance directive.
This statement is incorrect. Clients with severe mental illness can, and should, create psychiatric advance directives. These directives allow individuals to specify their preferences regarding mental health treatment in advance, ensuring their wishes are respected even if they are not able to communicate them at a later time due to their mental condition.
D. Clients who are violent can refuse chemical restraint.
This statement is generally incorrect. In emergency situations where a client poses an immediate danger to themselves or others, chemical restraint might be administered without the client's consent to ensure safety. However, there are strict guidelines and regulations surrounding the use of chemical restraints, and they should only be used in specific situations and as a last resort. In non-emergency situations, clients generally have the right to refuse any treatment, including chemical restraint, unless it is court-ordered due to their condition posing an imminent risk.
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
A. Request that the client's partner sign the consent form:
While involving the client's partner might offer emotional support and facilitate communication, legal and ethical guidelines typically require the informed consent of the individual undergoing the procedure. Having a partner sign the form without the client's explicit consent would not adhere to these standards.
B. Inform the client about the risks of refusing ECT:
Educating the client about the potential risks and benefits of ECT, as well as discussing alternative treatments, is a crucial step in the informed consent process. However, merely informing the client does not replace the need for the client to provide explicit, written consent for the procedure to be performed legally and ethically.
C. Cancel the scheduled ECT procedure:
This is the correct action. Without the client's signed consent, the procedure cannot proceed. Canceling the ECT procedure respects the client's autonomy and adheres to legal and ethical standards surrounding informed consent. The healthcare team should continue to engage with the client, addressing any concerns and questions, to obtain their informed and voluntary consent before rescheduling the procedure if the client chooses to proceed.
D. Proceed with preparation for ECT based on implied consent:
Implied consent is not sufficient for significant medical procedures such as ECT. Implied consent implies agreement based on actions or behavior rather than explicit, informed agreement. For procedures like ECT, it is essential to have documented, explicit, and voluntary consent from the client before proceeding. Relying solely on implied consent would not meet the ethical and legal requirements for informed consent.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.