A nurse is caring for a client.

Exhibits

Which of the following actions should the nurse take? Select all that apply.

Choice A rationale:

The role of a case manager involves coordinating and managing a client's care across various healthcare providers and services. This role focuses on the coordination of care and resources, not obtaining informed consent.

Choice B rationale:

The nurse manager is responsible for managing and overseeing nursing staff within a healthcare unit or department. Their primary role is related to administration and staff supervision, not obtaining informed consent.

Choice D rationale:

Researchers are individuals who conduct research studies and investigations to generate new knowledge and evidence. Their role is not related to obtaining informed consent from clients.

Choice C rationale:

The nurse is demonstrating the role of an advocate when obtaining informed consent from a client. Advocacy involves supporting the client's right to make informed decisions about their care. The nurse ensures that the client has all the necessary information, understands the procedure or treatment, and consents voluntarily. This includes explaining the risks and benefits, answering questions, and advocating for the client's autonomy and self-determination.

Choice A rationale:

Systematic reviews are considered Level I evidence in the hierarchy of evidence in evidence-based practice (EBP). Systematic reviews involve the rigorous and comprehensive synthesis of multiple research studies on a specific topic. This approach minimizes bias and provides the highest level of evidence for making clinical decisions. Systematic reviews typically follow a structured methodology and offer a critical analysis of the existing literature, making them a strong foundation for EBP.

Choice B rationale:

Credible websites are not considered Level I evidence. While some websites may contain reliable information, they vary in quality, and the credibility of the source must be carefully assessed. Relying solely on websites is not the most robust approach in EBP, as it lacks the rigorous systematic review and critical appraisal process of Level I evidence.

Choice C rationale:

Expert opinions are not considered Level I evidence. While expert opinions can be valuable, they are often based on individual experiences and interpretations rather than systematic research. Expert opinions are generally considered lower in the hierarchy of evidence compared to systematic reviews and other forms of research evidence.

Choice D rationale:

Qualitative studies are not considered Level I evidence. Qualitative studies provide valuable insights into the experiences, perceptions, and meanings associated with a particular phenomenon. However, they are typically ranked lower in the hierarchy of evidence compared to systematic reviews and quantitative research studies. Qualitative studies are more appropriate for addressing research questions related to subjective experiences and understanding the "why" and "how" of a phenomenon.