A client with delusions tells the nurse, "You aren't doing your job.
Go get those people over there and shoot them before they get me." Which statement is the nurse's best response?

When assessing an older client with left-sided heart failure (HF), the most important intervention for the practical nurse (PN) to implement is to auscultate all lung fields. Left-sided heart failure is characterized by the inability of the left ventricle to effectively pump blood, leading to fluid accumulation in the lungs. Auscultating all lung fields allows the PN to assess for the presence of abnormal lung sounds such as crackles, indicating pulmonary congestion.

Let's evaluate the other options:

a) Inspect for sacral edema.
Sacral edema is commonly associated with right-sided heart failure, not left-sided heart failure. While it is important to assess for edema in clients with heart failure, inspecting for sacral edema may not be the most immediate and crucial intervention in this specific case.

b) Measure urinary output.
Measuring urinary output is a valuable assessment in many clinical situations, but it may not be the most vital intervention in the context of left-sided heart failure. Monitoring urinary output is more relevant in assessing kidney function and fluid balance rather than directly assessing the severity of left-sided heart failure.

d) Check mental acuity.
Checking mental acuity is important in assessing the overall condition of the client, but it is not the most crucial intervention specifically related to left-sided heart failure. Mental status evaluation is more useful in identifying signs of altered mental status or potential complications, rather than directly assessing the impact of left-sided heart failure.

In summary, when assessing an older client with left-sided heart failure, the most important intervention for the practical nurse (PN) to implement is to auscultate all lung fields. This allows for the detection of abnormal lung sounds associated with pulmonary congestion, a hallmark sign of left-sided heart failure.

Choice A rationale:

The nurse should monitor the client for tachycardia as an adverse effect of beta blockers like metoprolol. Beta blockers work by reducing heart rate and blood pressure, so the presence of tachycardia would be unexpected and could indicate a potential adverse reaction to the medication.

Choice B rationale:

Hyperglycemia is not a common adverse effect of beta blockers like metoprolol. In fact, these medications can sometimes mask the symptoms of hypoglycemia, making it important for diabetic patients to closely monitor their blood glucose levels. However, hyperglycemia is not a typical side effect.

Choice C rationale:

Bronchospasm is not a common adverse effect of metoprolol. Beta blockers like metoprolol can cause bronchoconstriction in some individuals, but this effect is generally more prominent with non-selective beta blockers like propranolol. It is not a common adverse effect of metoprolol and would not be the primary concern when monitoring a patient on this medication.

Choice D rationale:

The nurse should monitor the client for hyperkalemia as an adverse effect of metoprolol. Beta blockers can inhibit the release of insulin from the pancreas, which can lead to elevated blood potassium levels (hyperkalemia). This is particularly important in patients with renal impairment, as they may have difficulty clearing excess potassium from the body.