A client is admitted with possible sepsis. Which action will the nurse perform first?

Choice A rationale:
Explaining legal requirements to inform sex partners at this initial stage is not the most appropriate or supportive intervention.
The client is in a state of emotional distress and may not be receptive to information about legal obligations. It's crucial to first address the client's emotional needs and provide support before discussing legal matters.
Prematurely focusing on legalities could further overwhelm the client and potentially hinder the development of a trusting relationship with the nurse.
Choice C rationale:
Offering to inform the family for the client, while well-intentioned, may not respect the client's autonomy and right to privacy. The decision to disclose HIV status to family members is a personal one that should be made by the client, not the nurse.
It's important to empower the client to make their own choices about disclosure and provide support throughout the process.
Choice D rationale:
Determining if a clergy member would help could be a valuable resource for some clients, but it should not be the first or only intervention.
It's essential to first assess the client's individual needs and preferences regarding spiritual support.
Not all clients may find comfort in religious or spiritual guidance, and some may prefer to seek support from other sources.
Choice B rationale:
Assessing the client for support systems is the most appropriate initial intervention because it focuses on the client's immediate needs for emotional support and connection.
By identifying existing support systems (such as family, friends, or community organizations), the nurse can help the client access resources that can provide comfort, understanding, and assistance in coping with the diagnosis.
This approach recognizes the client's emotional state and prioritizes their psychosocial well-being, which is essential in the initial stages of coping with an HIV diagnosis.

Choice A rationale:
Wearing a respirator when handling urine output is not routinely recommended for MRSA infections. While airborne transmission of MRSA is possible, it is primarily spread through direct contact with infected skin or surfaces. Respirators are typically reserved for situations where there is a high risk of aerosolization, such as during certain medical procedures.
The use of a respirator can be cumbersome and uncomfortable, and it may not provide significant additional protection in this context.

It's important to prioritize hand hygiene and contact precautions over respirator use for routine care of patients with MRSA infections.
Choice B rationale:
Limiting visitors strictly to immediate family members only is not necessary for MRSA infection control. Visitors can be educated on proper hand hygiene and contact precautions to minimize the risk of transmission.
Restricting visitors can have negative psychosocial impacts on the patient, such as isolation and decreased social support. It's important to balance infection control measures with the patient's overall well-being.
Choice C rationale:
Washing hands only after removing gloves post-care is inadequate for MRSA infection control. Hands should be washed thoroughly with soap and water or an alcohol-based hand sanitizer:
Before and after entering the patient's room
Before and after any contact with the patient or their surroundings After removing gloves
After using the toilet Before eating or drinking.

Choice D rationale:
Vancomycin is an antibiotic that is effective against MRSA infections. It is often the first-line treatment for these infections.
Preparing to administer vancomycin as prescribed by the healthcare provider is the most appropriate action to take to address the patient's MRSA infection.
Prompt initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy is essential to controlling the infection and preventing complications.