When the practical nurse (PN) atempts to assist an 18-year-old client with a mild mental disability to ambulate on the first postoperative day after an appendectomy, she becomes angry and says, "PN, 'Get out of here! I'll get up when I'm ready!"

Which response is best for the PN to make?

Choice A rationale:

Beginning continuous observation for transient episodes of neurologic dysfunction is important in the assessment and monitoring of the client's condition. However, in this scenario, the client is presenting with symptoms suggestive of a possible stroke or cerebrovascular event, and time is crucial. The nurse should prioritize actions that can lead to prompt diagnosis and treatment.

Choice B rationale:

Starting two large bore intravenous (IV) catheters and reviewing inclusion criteria for IV fibrinolytic therapy is the most urgent action. The client's symptoms, including sudden right-sided numbness, weakness, and facial droop, are indicative of a possible ischemic stroke. IV fibrinolytic therapy is time-sensitive and has a limited window of effectiveness. Establishing IV access and determining eligibility for this therapy should be the nurse's top priority to potentially improve the client's outcome.

Choice C rationale:

Administering aspirin to prevent further clot formation and platelet clumping is an important intervention in the treatment of ischemic stroke. However, it should not be the first action in this scenario. The priority is to assess for eligibility for IV fibrinolytic therapy, as this intervention has a more immediate impact on reversing the stroke's effects.

Choice D rationale:

Raising the head of the bed to 30 degrees and keeping the head and neck in neutral alignment is a reasonable nursing intervention to prevent complications such as aspiration and promote optimal cerebral blood flow. However, it is not the most urgent action in this case. The priority should be on assessing and potentially treating the stroke with IV fibrinolytic therapy.

Choice A rationale:

The nurse should consider the patient's physical abilities and limitations when planning recreational activities because this information is crucial for ensuring the safety and appropriateness of the activities. For example, a patient with limited mobility may benefit from activities that can be done in a seated position, while a patient with greater physical abilities may be able to engage in more active pursuits.

Choice B rationale:

The patient's cognitive abilities and limitations should also be taken into account when planning activities. Some patients may have cognitive impairments that require simpler, more straightforward activities, while others may be able to participate in more complex or intellectually stimulating options. This ensures that the activities are enjoyable and suitable for the individual's cognitive capacity.

Choice C rationale:

Considering the patient's interests and preferences is essential to make the recreational activities meaningful and enjoyable. It is important to involve patients in activities they find interesting and pleasurable, as this can have a positive impact on their emotional and psychological well-being during the rehabilitation process.

Choice E rationale:

The patient's cultural and religious background is an important consideration when planning activities. Some activities may be more or less acceptable to individuals from different cultural or religious backgrounds. It's essential to respect cultural and religious preferences to ensure that the activities do not cause discomfort or offense to the patients.

Choice D rationale:

The patient's age and gender are not the primary factors to consider when selecting appropriate activities for individuals in a rehabilitation and restorative care setting. Age and gender do not necessarily determine a person's interests, physical abilities, or cognitive limitations. Therefore, they are not as relevant as the other factors listed in this context.