The practical nurse (PN) is providing care for a client who is ordered nothing by mouth (NPO) after a small bowel resection. The client's nasogastric (NG) tube is connected to low intermitent suction. The client reports dizziness and tingling in digits.

Which assessment finding by the PN should be reported to the healthcare provider?

The injury description by the mother varies from the child's version.

Choice A rationale:

The practical nurse (PN) should note the significant indicator of possible child abuse, which is the discrepancy between the mother's description of the injury and the child's version. In cases of child abuse, perpetrators often provide inconsistent or conflicting explanations about how the injuries occurred, raising suspicion of maltreatment. This inconsistency can be a red flag for the PN to further assess the situation and, if necessary, report concerns to the appropriate authorities.

Choice B rationale:

While the child looking at the floor when answering questions might be a behavior worth noting, it alone is not a definitive indicator of child abuse. Children may exhibit various emotional responses for various reasons, and it requires further assessment to determine if there are signs of abuse.

Choice C rationale:

The healing of abrasions on the child's arms, legs, and chest does not necessarily indicate child abuse. Children are active and prone to minor injuries, which are a normal part of growing up. The PN should investigate further to determine the cause of the injuries.

Choice D rationale:

The mother describing in detail what she did for her injured child does not automatically suggest child abuse. It is essential for the PN to gather more information and conduct a comprehensive assessment before drawing any conclusions.

Check fundal consistency and continue to monitor the lochial flow amount.

Choice A rationale:

Inserting an indwelling catheter to empty the bladder and contract the fundus is not the appropriate action for a sudden gush of vaginal blood and blood clots. The priority here is to assess the fundus, not intervene with an indwelling catheter. Catheterization may be necessary for other reasons, but not in this context.

Choice B rationale:

Returning the client to bed and maintaining bedrest until the lochial flow slows may be a reasonable initial response, but it is not the most appropriate action. The sudden gush of blood and presence of blood clots could be indicative of postpartum hemorrhage or retained placental tissue, which require prompt evaluation.

Choice C rationale:

Checking fundal consistency and continuing to monitor the lochial flow amount is the most appropriate action. The sudden gush of blood and clots suggest a possible uterine atony or retained products of conception. Assessing the fundal height and firmness helps identify if the uterus is contracting adequately, while monitoring the lochial flow amount can indicate ongoing bleeding.

Choice D rationale:

Massaging the fundus and avoiding direct pressure on the cesarean incision is not the recommended action in this situation. Massaging the fundus without assessing its consistency could worsen bleeding if there is uterine atony, and the client needs immediate evaluation and monitoring.