The nurse is continuing to care for the adolescent.

Admission Assessment

1400:

Adolescent brought to emergency department by parents following a fall while skateboarding. Adolescent reports pain in their right leg as 10 on a scale of 0 to 10 and is unable to bear weight.

Adolescent is awake, alert, and oriented x 3. Lungs clear, respirations even and regular. S1 and S2 with regular rate and rhythm. Abdomen soft and nontender with active bowel sounds in all four quadrants. Right lower extremity with open wound and displaced bone. Right lower extremity pulse +1, extremity cool to touch, edema present, capillary refill 4 seconds.

Which of the following prescriptions should the nurse anticipate from the provider?

A. February 1 is not the correct EDB according to Nägele's rule. Nägele's rule states that to estimate the EDB, subtract three months from the LMP and add seven days and one year. Therefore, May 8 minus three months is February 8, plus seven days is February 15, plus one year is February 15 of the following year.

B. February 8 is not the correct EDB according to Nägele's rule. Nägele's rule states that to estimate the EDB, subtract three months from the LMP and add seven days and one year. Therefore, May 8 minus three months is February 8, plus seven days is February 15, minus seven days is February 8, plus one year is February 8 of the following year.

C. February 15 is the correct EDB according to Nägele's rule. Nägele's rule states that to estimate the EDB, subtract three months from the LMP and add seven days and one year. Therefore, May 8 minus three months is February 8, plus seven days is February 15, plus one year is February 15 of the following year.

D. February 22 is not the correct EDB according to Nägele's rule. Nägele's rule states that to estimate the EDB, subtract three months from the LMP and add seven days and one year. Therefore, May 8 minus three months is February 8, plus seven days is February 15, plus seven days is February 22, plus one year is February 22 of the following year.

Choice A reason:

Allow the client's partner to translate. While the partner may be well-intentioned, using a family member or friend as an ad-hoc interpreter can compromise the confidentiality of the information and may not accurately convey the client's medical concerns.

Choice B reason:

Have the client's child translate. Relying on a child to translate sensitive medical information is inappropriate, as it may burden the child and may lead to potential misunderstandings or omissions in communication.

Choice C reason:

Ask a nursing student who speaks the same language as the client to translate. Although a nursing student who speaks the same language as the client may be able to assist, using a professional interpreter is the preferred option. Professional interpreters have specific training in medical terminology and communication, ensuring the most accurate and effective exchange of information.

Choice D reason:

Using a professional interpreter is essential in situations where the healthcare provider and the client do not speak the same language. It ensures accurate communication, maintains confidentiality, and prevents misunderstandings. In this scenario, the nurse should request an interpreter who is proficient in the client's language to assist with the admission process.