The nurse is caring for a patient on a telemetry unit who has a regular heart rhythm and rate of 60 beats/min; a P wave precedes each QRS complex, and the PR interval is 0.20 seconds. Additional vital signs are: blood pressure 118/68 mm Hg, respiratory rate 16 breaths/min, and temperature 98.8°F (37°C). All of these medications are available on the medication record. What action will the nurse take?

Choice A Reason:

Documenting that the nasogastric tube is in the correct place is not appropriate in this scenario. A gastric pH of 7.35 is too high for stomach contents, which typically have a pH between 1.5 and 3.5. This high pH suggests that the tube may be misplaced, possibly in the respiratory tract or another non-gastric location. Therefore, documenting the tube as correctly placed could lead to serious complications if the tube is indeed misplaced.

Choice B Reason:

Notifying the health care provider is the most appropriate action. A pH of 7.35 is indicative of a potential misplacement of the nasogastric tube. The health care provider needs to be informed immediately to take corrective actions, such as ordering an X-ray to confirm the tube’s placement or re-evaluating the tube’s position. This step is crucial to ensure patient safety and prevent complications such as aspiration pneumonia or other adverse effects.

Choice C Reason:

Checking for placement by auscultating for air injected into the tube is an outdated and unreliable method. This technique can sometimes give false assurance of correct placement, as the sound of air can be heard even if the tube is in the respiratory tract. Current best practices recommend using pH testing and radiographic confirmation for accurate placement verification.

Choice D Reason:

Retesting the pH using another strip might seem like a reasonable step, but it is not the best immediate action. If the initial pH test shows a value of 7.35, it is unlikely that retesting will yield a significantly different result. The priority should be to notify the health care provider to address the potential misplacement promptly.

.

Choice A Reason:

Gaining weight can be an indicator of improved nutrition, but it does not directly address the client’s ability to swallow safely and effectively. Weight gain could be due to other factors such as fluid retention or changes in metabolism. Therefore, while it is a positive outcome, it is not the best indicator of improved swallowing function.

Choice B Reason:

Choosing preferred items from the menu indicates that the client is engaged in their meal planning and has an appetite. However, it does not directly measure the client’s ability to swallow safely. The client might still have difficulty swallowing even if they are choosing their preferred foods.

Choice C Reason:

Clear understanding and articulation are important for communication and can indicate cognitive improvement. However, this choice does not directly relate to the client’s swallowing ability. The primary concern in this scenario is the client’s ability to swallow safely, not their communication skills.

Choice D Reason:

Eating 75 to 100% of all meals and snacks is the best indicator that the client has improved their swallowing ability. This choice directly measures the client’s ability to consume food and liquids safely and effectively. It shows that the client can manage their meals without significant difficulty, which is the primary goal of the intervention.