On the second postoperative day, a client reports increasing abdominal pain. Assessment findings include a distended abdomen with absent bowel sounds. Which intervention should the nurse anticipate implementing?

Choice A reason: Administering an IV narcotic masks pain without addressing its cause. Pain at the PCI site may indicate hematoma or arterial injury, common post-PCI due to vessel trauma and tirofiban’s antiplatelet effects. Assessing the site identifies bleeding, critical to prevent complications like hemorrhage before providing analgesia.

Choice B reason: Adjusting the compression device without assessment risks worsening a hematoma, as excessive pressure impairs flow, while insufficient pressure fails to control bleeding. Tirofiban increases bleeding risk. Assessing for hematoma ensures proper management, preventing vascular complications, making adjustment premature without confirming the pain’s cause.

Choice C reason: Turning to a left side-lying position does not address PCI site pain, potentially from hematoma or arterial injury. Post-PCI, supine positioning minimizes site stress. Assessing for hematoma, exacerbated by tirofiban’s anticoagulation, is critical to detect bleeding, preventing complications like retroperitoneal hemorrhage over positional changes.

Choice D reason: Assessing the femoral PCI site for hematoma is essential, as pain may indicate bleeding, common post-PCI with tirofiban’s platelet inhibition. Hematoma can compress vessels, causing ischemia or rupture, requiring urgent intervention like compression or surgery. This addresses the pathophysiological risk, ensuring vascular stability and patient safety.

Choice A reason: Reviewing vascular disease history provides context but does not confirm perfusion status. An absent DP pulse may indicate arterial occlusion, risking ischemia. Doppler assessment directly evaluates blood flow, detecting patency, critical for guiding interventions to ensure limb perfusion, making history review secondary.

Choice B reason: Marking an auscultated DP pulse is incorrect, as pulses are palpated or Doppler-assessed, not auscultated. Auscultation applies to heart or lungs. Doppler confirms arterial flow, addressing absent pulse’s potential occlusion, making this inaccurate compared to the precise Doppler technique.

Choice C reason: Capillary refill evaluates perfusion but is less specific than Doppler, which confirms arterial flow. Prolonged refill may indicate ischemia, but absent DP pulse suggests arterial compromise. Doppler acoustically detects flow, diagnosing critical limb ischemia, making it the priority over indirect perfusion measures.

Choice D reason: Using Doppler to assess DP pulse is critical, as an absent pulse may indicate occlusion from peripheral arterial disease, risking ischemia. Doppler detects blood flow, confirming patency or obstruction, guiding urgent interventions like angiography, ensuring limb viability by addressing vascular compromise directly.