At one point in an assessment interview, a nurse asks, “Does your faith help you in stressful situations?” What assessment topic does this question fall under?

Choice A reason: Justice ensures fair treatment across patients. Different interventions (restraint vs. supervision) for self-mutilation, possibly due to serotonin dysregulation, must be equitably applied based on clinical need, not bias. Ensuring consistent, fair application of interventions aligns with justice, addressing ethical concerns about differential treatment in psychiatric care.

Choice B reason: Autonomy involves respecting patient choices, but self-mutilation, driven by impulsivity or emotional dysregulation, requires safety interventions overriding choice. Restraint and supervision prioritize safety over autonomy, making this principle less relevant than justice, which focuses on equitable treatment across patients in this scenario.

Choice C reason: Fidelity emphasizes keeping promises or loyalty to patients, not the fairness of intervention choices. While trust is crucial, the concern here is equitable treatment for self-mutilation, not commitment to promises. Fidelity is secondary to justice in addressing differential interventions, making it incorrect.

Choice D reason: Beneficence focuses on doing good, like preventing harm in self-mutilation. Both restraint and supervision aim to protect, but the ethical concern is fairness, not benefit. Justice addresses equitable application of interventions, making beneficence less directly applicable to the ethical dilemma described.

Choice A reason: Clarifying “pusillanimous” seeks specific meaning, ensuring accurate understanding of the patient’s emotional state. Dreams reflecting fear or inadequacy may involve amygdala hyperactivity or serotonin imbalances. This promotes therapeutic communication, addressing emotional distress linked to neurobiological stress responses, making it the most appropriate response.

Choice B reason: Relating personal experience shifts focus from the patient, reducing therapeutic effectiveness. Emotional drainage, possibly tied to REM sleep disruptions or cortisol spikes, requires exploration, not nurse self-disclosure. This risks dismissing the patient’s unique neurobiological experience, making it inappropriate for clarification.

Choice C reason: Assuming discomfort generalizes the dream’s impact without clarifying “pusillanimous.” Emotional drainage may reflect amygdala-driven stress responses, but this response lacks specificity. Clarification requires direct exploration of the term to understand its emotional and neurobiological significance, making this less effective.

Choice D reason: Summarizing poor sleep oversimplifies the emotional drainage, potentially linked to serotonin dysregulation or heightened stress responses. It fails to explore “pusillanimous,” missing the dream’s specific emotional content. Clarification requires detailed inquiry into the term’s meaning, making this response inadequate.