An adult patient visits the clinic expressing concern about a lump that appeared on their neck about a week ago.

Upon examination, the nurse finds a large, non-tender, hardened left subclavian lymph node without any overlying tissue inflammation.

What could these findings indicate?

Choice A rationale
Monitoring the patient’s blood pressure every 1 hour for 2 hours after paracentesis may not be sufficient. Paracentesis is a procedure to remove fluid that has accumulated in the abdominal cavity (a condition called ascites). This is a common problem in people with certain diseases, including liver and kidney disease. Changes in blood pressure can occur rapidly after this procedure, so more frequent monitoring is needed immediately after the procedure.
Choice B rationale
Monitoring the patient’s blood pressure every 5 minutes for one hour after paracentesis may be too frequent and could cause unnecessary stress for the patient. It is important to balance the need for monitoring with the patient’s comfort and well-being.
Choice C rationale
Monitoring the patient’s blood pressure every 15 minutes for one hour, then every 1 hour for 2 hours after paracentesis is a good schedule. This allows for close monitoring immediately after the procedure, when complications are most likely to occur. It then allows for continued monitoring as the patient stabilizes.
Choice D rationale
Monitoring the patient’s blood pressure every 5 minutes for 30 minutes, then every 4 hours thereafter may not provide enough monitoring in the immediate post-procedure period. While it is important to continue monitoring, the first few hours after the procedure are a critical time when complications are most likely to occur.

Choice A rationale

Monitoring the patient’s cardiac activity via telemetry is the most important intervention for a patient with acute renal failure (ARF), uncontrolled type 1 diabetes mellitus, and hyperkalemia who is receiving an IV dose of regular insulin. Hyperkalemia can cause cardiac arrhythmias and other cardiac complications. Therefore, continuous cardiac monitoring is crucial to detect any changes in heart rhythm or rate that could indicate worsening hyperkalemia.
Choice B rationale
While assessing glucose via fingerstick every 4 to 6 hours is important for a patient with uncontrolled type 1 diabetes mellitus, it is not the most important intervention in this scenario. The patient’s hyperkalemia and ARF pose more immediate risks.
Choice C rationale
Evaluating hourly urine output for return of normal renal function is an important part of monitoring a patient with ARF34. However, in the context of hyperkalemia and the administration of insulin, cardiac monitoring is more critical.
Choice D rationale
Maintaining venous access with an infusion of normal saline is a standard nursing intervention for most hospitalized patients, but it is not the most important intervention in this scenario.